The reaper was invented by:Cyrus Field
James Howe
Eli Whitney
Cyrus McCormick

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Hello!

The correct answer is Cyrus McCormick.

The reaper is a farm implement invented in 1831 by Cyrus McCormick. This machine was used by farmers to harvest crops mechanically, this semi automated device made easier to harvest wheat.

Hope this helps.


Answer 2
Answer:

Answer: The reaper was invented by Cyrus McCormick.


Related Questions

Why did Americans want a weak government
Slovakia became an independent nation in 1993 when it split witha. Hungary.c. the Czech Republic.b. Poland.d. the Slovenian Republic.
How was the postwar government of France different from that of Czechoslovakia? Which country belonged to NATO? Which was a member of the Warsaw Pact?
Hero tales can be found in every large culture, but are rarely found in smaller ones
One society living under one government is an

Which South Asian, Southeast Asian, or East Asian country do you believe has had the greatest success in meeting the needs of its people since World War II? Why?

Answers

China had been one of the countries that had boom after the World War II. China was not only able to meet the needs of its people. It is also slowly becoming one of the first world nation that has excel in the economic sector

 Write a comparison- contrast paragraph on the economies of Spain and the Netherlands around 1600.

Answers

Final answer:

The economies of Spain and the Netherlands in the 1600s had similarities and differences. Spain had a powerful American empire but faced competition from England and the Dutch in the Caribbean.

Explanation:

The economies of both the nations Spain and the Netherlands around the time period of 1600 had both similarities and differences. Spain retained its American empire, but it faced challenges from England and the Dutch Republic in colonizing smaller Caribbean islands.

In addition to this, the two countries had different strengths in trade, with England excelling in textiles and Spain in wine. In terms of trade, England excelled in producing textiles while Spain was more efficient in making wine. It was more economically efficient for England to buy wine from Spain and for Spain to buy cloth from England.

Learn more about economies of Spain and the Netherlands in the 1600s here:

brainly.com/question/515297

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Spain's economy around 1600 relied heavily on wealth from its colonies, sustained through the encomienda system and precious metals, leading to inflation and other issues. The Dutch economy was focused on trade, commerce, and shipping, exhibited by their significant merchant fleet and the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. Both economies benefited from colonial endeavors, though in different ways.

Explanation:

Around 1600, the economies of Spain and the Netherlands were distinctly characterized by their geographic, political, and colonial influences. Spain's economy was heavily reliant on the vast wealth extracted from its American colonies, particularly through the mining of gold and silver. This wealth fueled Spain's position as a dominant European power. However, it also led to economic issues such as inflation. The Spanish encomienda system of forced labor and the enslavement of Africans were tragic foundations of its economy.



In contrast, the Netherlands had a more diversified and modern economy, focused on commerce, shipping, and trade, supported by a significant merchant fleet and innovative financial institutions like the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. Dutch colonies, such as those in the Americas, were engaged in the fur trade with indigenous peoples, relying less on precious metals and more on mercantile economic practices.



Despite both countries being involved in colonial exploitation, their economic foundations and methods diverged significantly, with the Dutch economy reflecting more modern capitalist elements while the Spanish remained entrenched in the feudal extraction of wealth.

Learn more about the Economies of Spain and the Netherlands around 1600 here:

brainly.com/question/31348623

#SPJ3

Which was Peter the Great responsible for?A.reforming Russia and making it a republic
B.giving power to Russia’s highest ranking noblemen
C.turning Russia into a modern, powerful nation
D.following a policy of peace with Russia’s neighbors

Answers

The correct answer is C. Turning Russia into a modern, powerful nation.

Peter the great ruled Russian empire and Tsardom of Russia.

He implemented reforms on sweeping whereby his aim was to modernize Russia.

He also reorganized army in Russia where he had a dream of making Russia a power of maritime.

By a way of introducing western dress and French he implemented modernization on social in a wise manner.

Peter found more maritime outlets on how to improve position the seas of a nation.

Answer:

C.turning Russia into a modern, powerful nation

Explanation:

At the time Peter the Great became Tsar of Russia in 1682, the nation was at a great disadvantage to the other nations as it had remained isolated from modernization while most European countries had been enjoying it for a while. Peter the Great came to power to mark the beginning of a new era: his reign is best remembered for initiating a series of changes that turned Russia into a modern and powerful nation. He reformed the administrative system, expanded the territory and reorganized it, modernized the education, created a strong navy, reorganized the army according to Western standards, he subordinated the Orthodox Church to his reign, he founded and developed the city of Saint Petersburg, which became the capital city, among other changes.

What was a primary consequence of the sinking of the RMS Lusitania in 1915?OA
It caused German U-boat commanders to attack Allied ships more aggressively.
OB.
It resulted in an incalculable loss that weakened the financial position of Great Britain.
O C. It resulted in France making a formal declaration of war against Germany.
OD.
It caused many US citizens to shift away from their neutral stance on the war in Europe.

Answers

It caused many US citizens to shift away from their neutral stance on the war in Europe It caused many US citizens to shift away from their neutral stance on the war in Europe.

How did the United States move from a policy of neutrality to entering the war?

The United States decide to remain neutral in the war as they are in the outset of the war, Roosevelt saw the importance of arming France and Great Britain in order to counter Hitler's army.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about United States move from a policy of neutrality to entering the war, click here:

brainly.com/question/223074

#SPJ2

Answer: It caused many US citizens to shift away from their neutral stance on the war in Europe.

Explanation: Trust me, took the test and got it correct

What nation was run by the Sandinistas during the 1980s

Answers

NicaraguaThe Sandinista Revolution of 1979, in the nation of Nicaragua.

Hope I'm not too late and I hope this helped :)

was/were established to settle disputes between the states. A. The executive branch B. The State Department C. The presidency D. Central courts

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is D. Central courts