A
This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.
B
This study is not well designed because the sample may not have been randomly selected.
C
This study is not well designed because each customer should taste the two new formulas in the same order.
D
This study is not well designed because there is not enough replication with only 50 customers.
Answer:
The study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.
Hence, option B is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given information:
As the company needs to check the flavors of nachos which are newly launched and to sell a particular amount the nachos should be liked by the customers.
Now, the sample of 50 customers are taken to taste the nachos as compared to previous one and if the sample is being liked by the customers then surely the demand will increase but the formula is not compared with the original hence the study is not well designed.
From, the above observation one can conclude that the study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.
Hence option B is correct.
For more information visit:
flavored nachos, so as to deliver it with proper mentioned reason.Hence,
Hence, This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
As mentioned above, the cmpany needs to check the new upcoming flavors of nachos i.e., A and B and is said that it should meeet the requirement of getting better from their regular ones as well. For this, the company must release the two new nachos flavors A and B, irrespective of quantity and let the customers compare it with along the regular nachos.This demands for a fact that the 50 nachos been tasted should be compared with the regular flavored nachos so as to meet the demand getting better than the usual ones. For this to happen,the above mentioned study describes it the best.
This is the correct explanation for the above question
a.g/-4≥17
b.8x+63>127
plz help me quickly!!
B) 7 to 4
C) 4 to 7
D) 4 to 11
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n − 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n + 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n + 1), n > 0
Answer:
f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
f(1) = 5
f(2) = 10
Required
Determine f(n)
From the formulas in the option, we understand that the sequence is Arithmetic.
And will be determined using
f(n) = a + (n - 1)d
Where a = f(1) = 5
Substitute 5 for a,
f(n) = 5 + (n - 1)d
Or
f(n) = 5 + d(n - 1)
To test,
Take n = 2
d = f(2) - f(1) = 10 - 5 = 5
So, we have
f(n) = a + (n - 1)d
f(n) = 5 + (2 - 1) * 5
f(n) = 5 + 1 * 5
f(n) = 5 + 5
f(n) = 10
Hence,
Option B answers the question.
Answer:
The person who answered above meant to say that it was C not B.
Step-by-step explanation:
His answer was (1) = 5; f(n) = 5 + d(n − 1), n > 0 and this would have been c not b. B would have been f(1) = 5; f(n) = 5 ⋅ d(n + 1), n > 0 which is incorrect.
Plz dont report me i'm just trying to correct the answer above.
And i'm not doing this for points either. Just trying to help people fix their mistakes so that others don't mess up, that is all.
Hannah is having a new house built. The following is an initial blueprint of her new living room and entryway.
The perimeter of the scale drawing is ______centimeters.
If the scale is 1 centimeter = 5 feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be ______feet.
Numerically, the value of the actual perimeter of Hannah's living room and entryway would be _______times the value of the perimeter of the scale drawing.
Based on these results, if the scale is 1 centimeter = k feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be ______feet.
Thank you!
Answer:The first one is 22 The second one is 110 The third one is 5 The fourth one 22k
Step-by-step explanation:
dd all the sides of the scale drawing.
So, the perimeter of the scale drawing is 22 centimeters.
If the scale is 1 centimeter = 5 feet, then the dimensions of the actual living room and entryway are 20 feet, 25 feet, 30 feet, 5 feet, 10 feet, and 20 feet. Now, add all the sides of the actual living room and entryway.
So, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room and entryway would be 110 feet.
To find how many times larger the actual perimeter is than the scale drawing perimeter numerically, divide the numerical value of the actual perimeter by the numerical value of the scale drawing perimeter.
So, the value of the actual perimeter of Hannah's living room and entryway would be 5 times the value of the perimeter of the scale drawing.
Notice that in the scale of 1 to 5, the perimeter of the actual shape is 5 times the perimeter of the scale drawing. So, in a scale of 1 to k, the perimeter of the actual shape would be k times the perimeter of the scale drawing. Therefore, for the scale of 1 centimeter = k feet, the perimeter of Hannah's actual living room would be 22k feet.