the Democrats fought almost bitterly at times over: A.banking policies B.slavery issues C.tariff rates D.all of the above

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The answer is D.all of the above.  During the era of slavery, many Democrats favored the slave system as it was their main source of labor in the plantations.  They also fought against banking systems because they were worried about the controls that the banks had over people’s money.  They also debated on tariffs due to the protection of their local industries.

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

The answer is All of the above

Explanation:

I say this because Democrats are mainly for the people whenever Republicans are more traditional.


Related Questions

The average adult eats about 4,000 calories a day. True or False
Which sentence describes how the migration of farmers from rural to urban areas affected Europe?Many villages were abandoned, leading to lower food production.The number and population of cities increased rapidly.Most farmers in rural areas prospered because more land was available.Governments began to regulate industries to ensure the welfare of workers.
How did john calvin's ideas and beliefs further the development of individualism?
Do you think people should be ranked at all in a society​
What did Martin Luther post on a church door to publicly criticize the misuse of indulgences? a. Ninety-five thesesb. Reformationc. Ten Commandmentsd. List of popes

how does this quote apply to life “ Learn from yesterday, Live for today, Hope for tomorrow. The important thing is to not stop questioning” - Albert Einstein

Answers

The quote is applied to life by realizing that there is no point in mulling over the past, but that we should rather learn from it so as to not repeat mistakes. Life for today can be to not just become mindless machines and to live and let others live and enjoy ourselves. Hope for tomorrow means that we should always be optimistic and hope for the best, while never stop questioning means that we should not allow others to decide for us what is right or wrong.

10 points: Was the Treaty of Versailles a just and fair peace treaty or an unjust and unfair one? Was it a good peace treaty for the future or not? Write a three-paragraph essay that answers these questions. The first paragraph should be an introductory paragraph that provides some background information about the treaty. The second paragraph should answer the first question, and the third paragraph should answer the second question. Begin the second and third paragraphs with clear topic sentences and include facts to support your claims.

Answers

The Treaty of Versailles Yes, I think that the Treaty of Versailles was very fair to Germany. I think this because Germany deserved something bad in return for even starting the war. It was not fair to Germany how they did not really have a say on what went on in with the Treaty of Versailles. Germany should have known this was going to happen to them. They caused many men to become hurt, and even be killed by their own stupidity. Using the Schliffen Plan might of been good on their part,but in reality that was not a very good move for them. Continuing on and looking at Europe. Europe was destroyed and that should all be put on Germany's shoulders for that because Europe did not deserve anything of what happened to them. I would also have to say that I mostly agree with what Woodrow Wilson had to say. He said that Germany should pay for the things they have done and that is exactly it! I agree with not being able to have an air force in the air which is fair to some point. Flying over others to see where, and what they are doing I think is wrong. That is why I agree with the terms of not being able to have an air force in the air because if you did then you would easily be able to take out the enemy, and who would not do that? Anybody would most likely because it is most likely easier to kill more people with a plane then it is to shoot somebody. I surely did not agree with the fact that some of the land that was already claimed was taken away. From then on with the economy not being that great some countries did not have enough land where as some were on the edge of having nothing.

I'll let you work on the first paragraph on your own ...  look up the Paris Peace Conference, which is what led to the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.

As for the second and third paragraphs, I'll offer my own opinion.  But you should do your own research and form your own opinion as well.

In my opinion the Treaty of Versailles was essentially unjust and unfair.  The treaty placed all blame for the cause of the Great War (World War I) on Germany as the leader of the Central Powers.  In reality, as detailed by historian Barbara Tuchman in her Pulitzer Prize winning book, The Guns of August (1962), all the involved nations of Europe contributed to process of creating the war.

The Treaty of Versailles also was not a good peace treaty for the future, because the harsh terms put Germany in a situation that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, leading to World War II.  In addition to the "war guilt" clause of the treaty (forcing Germany to admit responsibility for causing the war), Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the war's victorious nations.   The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded.  Then the Great Depression hit and made things even worse.  (Germany's depression conditions were even worse than those in America.) The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

trade routes along which coast when arab and indian traders from around the indian ocean mixed with the bantu people from africas interior

Answers

Indian ocean is the answer.
Hi There! :)

Trade routes along which coast when arab and indian traders from around the indian ocean mixed with the bantu people from africa's interior

Africans & Indian ocean 

Which World War II event occurred first?The United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan.
President Harry Truman was sworn in to office.

Answers

The answer: President Harry Truman was sworn into office.

Harry Truman was sworn into office as the 33rd U.S. president on April 12th in 1945, following the death of President Franklin Roosevelt. While the two atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki three months later, on August 6 and August 9, respectively, of that same year. Inevitably, Japan announced its surrender to the Allies six days later. And the following month, the war finally ended.

It would be "President Harry Truman was sworn in to office" that occurred first, since the US dropping the atomic bombs on Japan effectively ended the war after Roosevelt died. 

when the allies met in 1919 to negotiate the treaty of Versailles what was the long term affect of the agreement

Answers

The Treaty of Versailles caused long-term instability in Europe (and parts of Asia) by ignoring the nations who had lost WWI. The treaty didn't provide any support for the nations who had lost, creating resentment in the hearts' of their people. This disunity allowed for the rise of facist dictators post-WWI, eventually causing World War II.

The Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade were based on the principle of the right to

Answers

The Supreme Court decisions in Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade were based on the principle of the right to Personal Privacy.

The right to privacy means that personal information of any individual is protected from public scrutiny. According to the supreme court's Roe v. Wade decision, a woman has all the rights to have an abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Whereas, the supreme court's decision in Griswold v. Connecticut was about access to contraception.

Answer:

Privacy

Explanation:

got it right on edge23 :)