Which type of faulty logic appears in these sentences? Congressman Brown's own property was included in the improvement project he brought to our town. He was not acting for the greater good at all. A false analogy B either-or fallacy C ad hominem D appeal to ignorance

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "B either-or fallacy." Congressman Brown's own property was included in the improvement project he brought to our town. He was not acting for the greater good at all. The logic here appears as an 'either-or fallacy'

Related Questions

Pronouns used as direct objects, indirect objects, and objects of the prepositions are _____ case pronouns.a. subjective b. nominative c. objective d. possessive
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear
In 1930 Mohandas "Mahatma Gandhi led a nonviolent march in India protesting Britain's colonialtriggering moment for the targer civil disobedience movement that eventually con todas las pendencefrom Britain in 1947. Shortly before the Salt March, Gandhi had written to Viceroy Lord Irwin, therepresentative of the British crown in India. The passage below is the conclusion of that letter. Read thepassage carefully. Write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices Gandhi makes to convey hismessage to Lord Irwin that the taxes should be reversed.I know that in embarking on non-violence, I shallbe running what might fairly be termed a mad riskthough they undoubtedly are for the consideration ofany scheme of Government they have little bearingBut the victories of truth have never been wonwithout risks, often of the gravest character,on the greater problems which are above communitiesConversion of a nation that has consciously orand which affect them all equally. But if you cannotunconsciously preyed upon another, far moresee your way to deal with these evils and my lettermakes no appeal to your heart, on the eleventh daynumerous, far more ancient, and no less culturedthan itself, is worth any amount of riskof this month, I shall proceed with such co-workers of50 the Ashram' as I can take, to disregard the provisionsI have deliberately used the word conversion. For of the salt laws. I regard this tax to be the most10 my ambition is no less than to convert the Britishiniquitous of all from the poor man's standpoint.people through non-violence, and thus to make them As the independence movement is essentially for thesee the wrong they have done to India. I do not seek poorest in the land, the beginning will be made withto harm your people. I want to serve them even as I 55 this evil. The wonder is that we have submitted to thewant to serve my own. I believe that I have always cruel monopoly for so long. It is, I know, open to you15served themto frustrate my design by arresting me. I hope thatI served them up to 1919, blindly. But when my there will be tens of thousands ready, in a disciplinedeyes were opened and I conceived non-co-operation, manner, to take up the work after me, and, in the actthe object still was to serve them. I employed the 60 of disobeying the Salt Act, to lay themselves open tosame weapon that I have, in all humility, successfully the penalties of a law that should never have20 used against the dearest members of my family. If I disfigured the statute book.have equal love for your people with mine, it will notI have no desire to cause you unnecessarylong remain hidden. It will be acknowledged by them, embarrassment, or any at all, so far as I can help. Ifeven as members of my family acknowledged, 65 you think that there is any substance in my letter, andthey had tried me for several years. If the people if you will care to discuss matters with me, and if to25 join me, as I expect they will the sufferings theywillthat end you would like me to postpone publicationundergo, unless the British nation sooner retraces its of this letter, I shall gladly refrain on receipt of asteps, will be enough to melt the stoniest hearts.telegram to that effect soon after this reaches you.The plan through civil disobedience will be to70 You will, however, do me the favour not to deflect mecombat such evils as I have sampled out. If we want from my course, unless you can see your way to30 to sever the British connection it is because of suchconform to the substance of this letter.evils. When they are removed, the path becomes easy. This letter is not in any way intended as a threat,Then the way to friendly negation willbe open. If but is a simple and sacred duty, peremptory on a civilthe British commerce with India is purified of greed, 75 register. Therefore, I am having it specially deliveredyou will have no difficulty in recognizing ourby a young English friend who believes in the Indian35 independence. I invite you then to pave the way for cause and is a full believer in non-violence and whomProvidence seems to have sent to me, as it were, forimmediate removal of those evils, and thus open athe very purpose.way for real conference between equals, interestedonly in promoting the common good of mankind1 A spiritual retreat or monastery for a community of Hindusthrough voluntary fellowship and in arranging terms2 The India Salt Act (1852) enforced the British colonial government's monopoly on40 of mutual help and commerce equally suited to both.the collection, manufacture, and sale of salt in InduYou have unnecessarily laid stress upon communalproblems that unhappily affect this land. Importantafter the
Which word most likely refers to a person?
Why is this fight so important to Felix and Antonio ?

If someone were researching current developments with colloidal cancer, this source could be inappropriate because

Answers


A)The source is outdated.B)The source is a dictionary.C)The source has too little information.D)The source has information on irrelevant meanings of "cancer."

Answer:

the source is outdated

Explanation:

The source is outdated. According to the title line, this source is from 1913 and is therefore outdated and inappropriate for current cancer developments. A dictionary, even with little information, can be an appropriate source for documented definitions. Additional irrelevant information can be disregarded.

The following words have roots with one syllable. To each, the -ing suffix has been added. Which word is spelled correctly? A. Shiping
B. Hiting
C. Meeting
D. Triming

Answers

The correctly spelled Word is meeting. All of the other words need a double consonant. So we need :shipping trimming and hitting. You know that a word needs a double consonant in the gerund form if it has a short vowel.
When a word ia a monosyllable ending with a consonant and preceded by one vowel, the last consonant has to be doubled before adding a suffix that begins with a vowel Ex, ship + p + ing = shipping
                    hit + t + ing = hitting
                  trim+ m + ing = trimming
When the last consonant is preceded by 2 vowels ,then it doesn't double .Just add 'ing'             meet + ing = meeting
                  wait +ing = waiting

To purge something is to

Answers

to get rid of... so like, purging when you're referring to the eating disorder would be to make yourself throw up or just get rid of the fat. When people say purge it usually has a negative meaning, as well

The author uses words such as "daunting." "never-ending," and "tiring" to create what tone?А
morose
B
annoyed
С
disgruntled
D
intimidating

Answers

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Morose is like worn out or sad, you know, like a gloomy kind of feel

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I believe the correct answer is morose, the definition of morose is "sullen and ill-tempered" therefore it seems to fit with those words the best. I believe choice A is your best option.

The graph combines U.S. and Canada oil production. U.S. oil production alone peaked at 3.5 billionbarrels in 1970, and then declined steadily-seeming to fulfill Hubbert's theory. In the early 2000s,
however, new production methods such as hydraulic fracturing boosted U.S. oil to 1970 levels.
According to economists, what occurs when output increases because of improved technology?

Answers

When output increases because of improved technology, it often leads to an economic phenomenon known as "technological advancement" or "technological progress." This occurs when advancements in technology enable the production of more goods or services with the same or fewer resources. In the context of the U.S. oil production described in your statement, the use of hydraulic fracturing technology allowed for increased oil production, even surpassing previous peak levels from 1970.

Technological advancement can have several economic implications, including:

1. **Increased Efficiency:** Improved technology often leads to more efficient production processes, reducing production costs per unit and potentially increasing overall output.

2. **Economic Growth:** When output increases, it can contribute to economic growth by expanding industries, creating jobs, and boosting economic activity.

3. **Competitiveness:** Nations or firms with access to cutting-edge technology can gain a competitive advantage in the global market, as they can produce goods or services more efficiently and at a lower cost.

4. **Higher Standards of Living:** Technological progress can lead to higher standards of living as it allows for the production of more goods and services, providing consumers with a wider range of choices and potentially lower prices.

5. **Resource Conservation:** Improved technology can sometimes lead to more sustainable resource use by reducing waste and optimizing resource utilization.

In the case of U.S. oil production, the adoption of hydraulic fracturing technology led to a resurgence in oil production and played a significant role in the energy landscape. However, it's worth noting that technological advancements can also raise environmental and ethical concerns, which require careful consideration and regulation.

ramiro is 3/10 as tall as the flagpole. the flagpole is 5/9 as tall asa nearby tree.the tree is 32 2/5 feet tall. how tall is rammiro

Answers

Tree height: 32 2/5
Flagpole: 5/9 * 32 2/5
Ramiro: 3/10 * Flagpole

5/9 * 32 2/5 =
= 5/9 * 162/5 =
= 1/9 * 162/1 =
= 1/1 * 18/1 =
= 1 * 18 =
= 18 [feet]

So the flagpole is 18 feet tall. Ramiro is 3/10 of its height, so:

3/10 * 18 =
= 54/10 =
= 5 4/10 =
= 5 2/5

Answer: Ramiro is 5 2/5 feet tall.