The correct answer is B. It was designed to squeeze the South from all sides like an anaconda.
Explanation
In the XIX century during the Civil War of the United States the Union headed by Winfield Scott created the Anaconda Plan that was about a siege to the Southern Confederacy through a blockade of the Mississippi and Tennessee river, this situation caused an economic squeeze against Confederacy because it was the principal access and exit for its products and both were closed. the Anaconda Plan was an important step to get the final victory in the Civil War, nevertheless, the Union needed an armed confrontation against Confederacy to win. Another characteristic is the name of the Plan, the Union proposed this name because the plan was related to an anaconda attack that wraps and presses its victim to death and similarly the plan aimed at enclosing and pressing the Confederates to defeat them. So, the correct answer is B. It was designed to squeeze the South from all sides like an anaconda.
I relatively think so.
True democracy is one in which everyone has the same opportunities to be defined as the representative of the people. In this context, the draw seems to be the most effective way to maintain the level playing field, since it discards any kind of economic and ideological influence. Not at all, Montesquieu (1746) and other thinkers suggest that the method of choosing lottery rulers would represent the true nature of democracy.
The logic behind the draw process comes directly from the idea that power corrupts, which makes sense when analyzing the current political landscape of various countries. However, the applicability of a lottery system should be widely discussed, but it does not seem reasonable for the present, but that makes sense, it does.
Legislative, executive, and judiciary departments of government were given separate powers under the U.S. Constitution. The Legislative branch makes laws . The Executive branch puts the law into practice. Lastly, the legal system is interpreted by the judiciary.
Through the system of checks, each branch can contest the authority of the other branch and maintain equilibrium.
In order to check the executive branch, the legislative branch has the following powers: "Impeachment power; Trial of impeachments (Senate); Selection of the President (House) and Vice President in the case of a plurality of electoral votes," while "Senate approval of federal judges" is one of the checks on the judiciary.
The vice president serves as the Senate's president and has the power to veto legislation, while the executive branch also has the authority to nominate judges and grant pardons.
Judicial review; Seats are held on good behavior and Compensation cannot be lowered" and "Judicial review; Chief Justice sits as President of the Senate during presidential impeachment" are the two ways the judicial branch checks the legislature and the executive.
To learn more about judiciary
#SPJ5
Answer:
The U.S. Constitution did a Separation of Powers in three branches: Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. “First, the Legislative branch makes the law. Second, the Executive branch executes the law. Last, the Judicial branch interprets the law.”.
But each branch can challenge the power of the other branch and keep balance through the system of checks.
Explanation:
The Legislative can do Checks on the Executive like “Impeachment power (House); Trial of impeachments (Senate); Selection of the President (House) and Vice President (Senate) in the case of no majority of electoral votes” while the Checks on the Judiciary included: “Senate approves federal judges.”.
The Executive Branch Checks on the Legislature included “Veto power and Vice President is President of the Senate” while for Checks on the Judiciary: “Power to appoint judges and Pardon power”.
The Judicial Branch Checks on the Legislature are “Judicial review; Seats are held on good behavior and Compensation cannot be diminished” and Checks on the Executive are “Judicial review; Chief Justice sits as President of the Senate during presidential impeachment”.
The Judiciary plays a critical role in maintaining the system of checks and balances because it involves policing if the Executive and Legislative are not too powerful or unbalanced; solving cases of disputes between the executive and legislative and also protecting the citizen’s rights and the U.S. Constitution.