That is so false. Terrorism does not have a race culture nor religion behind it. Anyone can be a terrorist to stereotype a religion or race is absurd and very ignorant. And I know your just asking so no offense towards you but just to people who think that.
An amendment is quicker to pass than an act.
An amendment can be changed if society shifts in the future.
An amendment automatically triggers lawsuits if it is ignored.
The first alternative is correct (A).
When an amendment is approved, it becomes part of the Constitution. In this way, the issue becomes a guaranty constitutionally guaranteed.
Therefore, having legislation ratified by the Constitution is positive because it signals the long-term maintenance of the benefit, since to change the Constitution requires a great unity of the Congress. To date, the American Constitution has only had 27 amendments, with the top 10 making up the Bill of Rights.
For the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution.
For example, notice how the Virginia Declaration of Rights served as a model for the 1st Amendment (the first of the amendments that make up the Bill of Rights):
Virginia Declaration of Rights, Section 12:
That the freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotick governments.
Virginia Declaration of Rights, Section 16:
That religion, or the duty which we owe to our CREATOR and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.
1st Amendment, US Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
b. cases involving conflict between states
c. cases involving action by the US government against one of the states
d. cases involving the banking system
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
There are no choices but the separation of power was essential to ensure that government was fair and balanced. Each branch of government had a function that would allow it to check the other branches if it became too intrusive or it step out of bounds of its function.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Hope it Helps
The suspect claims he or she did commit the crime and does not want the case to go to trial.
The suspect does not admit guilt, but does not wish to fight the charges and does not want a trial.
The suspect does not understand the charges and wants a trial to better understand the accusation.
The answer is: The suspect does not admit guilt, but does not wish to fight the charges and does not want a trial.
Plea of no contest usually would occurs in either one of these two situations. The first one is that the defendant realize that he could not defend against the situation, so he choose to plea of no contest in order to get lighter punishment. Second is the defendant is offered into a deal to reveal another possible crimes from bigger target.
Answer:
C. The suspect does not admit gulity, but does not wish to fight charges and does not want a trial.
Explanation:
I took the test in edgen November 2020