The answer is: It compares the city to an animal, which has a hard, protective shell, but a soft underbelly.
In this excerpt from "The City Without Us" Alan Weisman use the metaphor to compare the city of Manhattan to and animal, compares its weak points to an animal underbelly and the strengths as an animal’s hard shell that covers the surface to protect its vulnerable parties.
A. It compares the city to an animal, which has a hard, protective shell, but a soft underbelly. -Apex
a) Bag End
b) Crookhollow Bend
c) Brandywine End
d) Lothlorien
by indicating which conversations occurred and which did not
by suggesting why the event described is so well known
by showing how many passengers were on the ship
Answer:
A. by presenting the characters as people in a real-life situation
Explanation:
I am so annoyed because I actually thought the other person is right but its actually A. I had put their answer and it was wrong. The correct answer is A.
Have a great day/night! :)
B. love.
C. reason.
D. pride.
According to the above we can infer that the Renaissancephilosophy, commoners often represent A. appetite.
In Renaissancephilosophy, the human psyche was often divided into three parts: appetite, reason, and will. Commoners, or the lower class, were associated with the "appetitive" part of the psyche. This aspect referred to desires, passions, and instinctual drives.
The commoners were considered to be driven by their material needs and bodily desires. They were associated with the lower, more basic aspects of human nature. In contrast, reason was associated with the intellectual and rational faculties, while will represented the higher, moral aspects of human nature.
So, in Renaissance philosophy, commoners were often symbolically linked to appetite (option a).
Learn more about Renaissance philosophy in: brainly.com/question/34217043
#SPJ6