The nations of Eastern Europe did NOT apply for Marshall Plan aid because \?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The nations of Eastern Europe did not apply for Marshall Plan aid because they were under the control of the USSR, which was soon locked in an ideological battle with the US over different economic systems. 
Answer 2
Answer:

Eastern European countries were forced by the URSS to reject the aid of the Marshall Plan. If those countries applied for the plan, they had to leave the Soviet influence sphere.

In turn, the URSS created the Molotov Plan in 1947 to provide economic assistance for reconstruction to Eastern European Countries under its influencs. It was the alternative to the Marshall Plan, designed for the East. It was the origin of the Comecon.


Related Questions

which of the following describes a difference between American and European economic imperialism in china during the 19th century
How did the first World War ignite the second World War?
Question 8 of 14Which sentence best completes the diagram?Congress's powers underthe Articles ofConfederationPassing laws thatapply to all states?Printing andborrowing moneyA. Forcing states to obey national lawsB. Collecting taxes from state governmentsc. Creating a national court systemΟ ΟD. Making agreements with other countries
The popularity of the Gutenberg press in Europe made books more accessible and motivated people to want to learn how to
HELPPP 20 POINTTTSSSWhy did Adam Smith believe it was better to pursue personal interests, rather than the general interest of a society?

Which statement about the Supreme Court is true? Every case appealed to the Supreme Court is ruled upon by the court. The court hears all cases for which two or more justices agree that the case has merit. The court decides which cases it will hear. In deciding cases, the chief justice’s vote counts as two votes. The court can hear only cases that have worked their way up from local courts.

Answers

The Supreme Court decides which cases it will hear.

The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to rule on every case that is sent to it.  The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year.  The vast majority of those cases do work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts.  About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.  But there are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government.

Supreme Court only hears the cases which have worked their way all the way up from local state courts.

Further Explanation:

The Supreme Court of United States is the highest court of the country. It looks after the workings of government in regards to rights provided to people and also keeps an eye of working of lower courts such as Local and State Courts. It never takes up any new case. All the cases that come to Supreme Court for hearing and further verdict come from lower courts. If someone is unsatisfied with the verdict which is given to him/her from lower court then He/She has full right to re-appeal against the verdict in Supreme Court. There is one chief justice and eight associate judges in the Supreme Court. All the judges of Supreme Court are appointed for lifetime. Supreme courts works both under Appellate jurisdiction and Original Jurisdiction.  Every year around 10000 cases come to Supreme Court for review but only 80-100 are accepted for reviewing after going through those cases. If Supreme Court chooses to hear a case, both parties are given 30 minutes each to present their case orally and sometimes in some cases, If Supreme Court feels to hear the case more, then this period of oral discussion can also be extended. Earlier the argument of cases used to go on for days and weeks but with the time the workload on Supreme Court has increased and that is the reason there is time limit set for the discussion of a case by Supreme Court.  

Learn more:

1.Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana? brainly.com/question/8891404

2.In the Supreme Court’s decision in korematsu v. United States, the court said that korematsu? brainly.com/question/8391589

Answer details:

Grade:High School

Subject: Constitution

Chapter:Supreme Court

Keywords:

Supreme Court, Local Court, State Court, Judge, Authority, Case, Verdict, Case Hearing, Lifetime Appointment, Case discussion, Appellate jurisdiction.

How was the Roman Empire different after Constantine's recognition of Christianity?A. Previously intolerant, Rome became known as a place in which all religions were equally tolerated.
B. Inspired by their emperor to convert, the newly Christian Roman soldiers became more loyal to the empire.
C. Roman cultural achievement fell as pagan philosophers, scientists, and artists fled in fear of persecution.
D. Once Constantine accepted Christianity, the Roman Empire became the center of the new faith's growth.

Answers

Answer:

I think that the answer is D but I'm not sure bc I also think B

The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were brought together in the Connecticut Compromise. This compromise helped create a defining characteristic of Congress. Which characteristic of Congress BEST fits in the blank above?A.
Senate Subcommittees
B.
Bicameral Legislature
C.
House Subcommittees
D.
President Pro Tempore

Answers

The characteristic of Congress best fits in the blank above would be "Bicameral Legislature" This was to accommodate for the smaller states having less representation. 

The correct answer is B) Bicameral Legislature.

The characteristic of Congress is Bicameral Legislature.

The Connecticut Compromise was also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 because it represented an important agreement over a complicated dispute. The states agreed on how much power should the larger and smaller states should have under the new United States Constitution, defining the representation of the states. Another important result of the agreement was the creation of the bicameral legislature, the House of Representatives.

What factor most likely determined how often a nomadic group moved?the lack of geographical protectionthe lack of close proximity to a river or lakethe group's boredom with the surroundingsdwindling food supplies

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "the lack of close proximity to a river or lake." The factor that most likely determined how often a nomadic group moved is that the lack of close proximity to a river or lake."

Answer:

B

Explanation:

lack of close proximity to a river or lake

Which statement best describes the Siege of Boston in 1775?

Answers

The correct answer is:

Colonists tried to take back the city from the British.

Explanation:

Siege of Boston, (April 1775–March 1776), a triumphant siege by American bands of the British-held city of Boston through the American Revolution. Following the Battles of Lexington and Concord (April 19, 1775), Boston was attacked by American militiamen. New England kept the expansion through a place that is known for the British Army garrisoned in what was then the peninsular city of Boston, Massachusetts.

Colonists tried to take back the city from the British.

Despite the success of the Four Modernization, many Chinese people believed that advances were still needed in

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Democracy." Despite the success of the Four Modernization, many Chinese people believed that advances were still needed in democracy.