Describe how other countries feel about the War in Iraq. Why do they or don’t they support the war?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The countries weren't particularly happy with the war in Iraq at the beginning despite the fact that some of them gave initial support to the US invading Iraq. The reason was that they really thought the war to be unjustified. 

Related Questions

The Sandinistas are associated with the country of
(75 POINTS!!!) World War II was one of the most significant events of the 1900s and one of the most important events in US history. Think about how much the United States changed between the Great Depression and the postwar era, when the country had become an economic powerhouse. How did World War II influence and change the identity of the United States throughout the 1900s and into the present? What are some positive and negative changes that occurred in the United States in the years after World War II?
What was the name given to low-cost multi-family dwellings in the cities in the late 1800s
Antilog 0.4183​
So what did Russia feel they had to do to prove themselves?-Protect the Slavic people-Take over the Dardanelles-Fight off the Ottomans-Protect the Russians

Were the Alien and Sedition Acts constitutional or unconstitutional? Did they follow the meaning of the Constitution or did they violate it in some way? Be prepared to cite the Constitution in your response.Second, what would happen if the individual states chose to nullify these acts or any others? What would it mean for the country?
Lastly, should the United States institute some form of the Alien and Sedition Acts in today's post 9/11 world? Explain your answer and by the events surrounding the Alien and Sedition Acts to today.

Answers

The Alien and Sedition Acts were four bills passed by the Congress and signed by president John Adams in 1798. These bills made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen, they allowed the president to imprison and deport non-citizens who were deemed dangerous or were from a hostile nation and criminalized making false statements that were critical of the federal government.

  • Critics of these acts argued that they were an attempt to suppress voters who disagreed with the Federalist Party and that they violated the right of freedom of speech in the First Amendment.
  • If any individual states chose to nullify these acts, it would be consider a serious sign of rebellion. This was almost the case, with the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.
  • The United States should not implement these laws as their immigration system is already extremely strict. It is very unlikely that severe threats to security are being caused by immigrants, and if they were, the US already has significant power to deal with them. All of this makes new laws unnecessary.


The Alien and Sedition Acts were unconstitutional as it limited free speech, which is guaranteed in the first Amendment.  If the individual states chose to nullify the acts, that would be a sign of rebellion.  I do not think that the US should institute forms of the Alien and Sedition Act.  It's America. The people here should be free to say what they want to say.

How did public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 differ from the view of historians today?

Answers

The purchase of Alaska was generally viewed as positive, but some felt that we didn't have the population to fill it, and, as with the Indians, it would be hard to govern indigenous people. Most people now approve because of Alaska's vast resources. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.

Final answer:

Public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 was initially negative but historians today recognize it as a strategic move by the United States, providing access to resources and expanding influence in the Pacific.

Explanation:

Public opinion about the purchase of Alaska in 1867 differed from the view of historians today in several ways:

  1. At the time, the purchase was mocked in the press as 'Seward's Folly' and criticized as a waste of money. However, historians today recognize it as a strategic boon to the United States, as it provided access to valuable resources and expanded American influence in the Pacific.
  2. Public opinion in 1867 was influenced by concerns about the cost of the purchase ($7.2 million) and doubts about the value of the territory. In contrast, historians today recognize the long-term benefits of the purchase, including the discovery of oil and other natural resources in Alaska.
  3. During the time of the purchase, the idea of manifest destiny and the belief in American expansionism were prevalent. Public opinion saw the purchase as a way to fulfill these ideals. In contrast, historians today view the purchase in the context of imperialism and recognize the complex history of Indigenous peoples in Alaska.

Learn more about purchase of Alaska in 1867 here:

brainly.com/question/945957

#SPJ11

Is the one who called the Soviet domination of East Europe an Iron Curtain.

Answers

The Iron Curtain was the name for the boundary dividing Europe into two separate areas from the end of World War II in 1945 until the end of the Cold War in 1991. The term symbolized efforts by the Soviet Union to block itself and its satellite states from open contact with the West and non-Soviet-controlled areas. On the east side of the Iron Curtain were the countries that were connected to or influenced by the Soviet Union. On either side of the Iron Curtain, states developed their own international economic and military alliances
I hope this helps

Help me T^T Describe how stratification can help date artifacts found at a site.

Answers

Answer:

here you go :)

Explanation:

Stratification tells us that the closer something is to the surface, the newer it is. That means that artifacts found deep in the site are older. This helps to provide relative dating for artifacts.

Answer:

Hopes this helps

Explanation:

Stratification tells us that the closer something is to the surface, the newer it is. That means that artifacts found deep in the site are older. This helps to provide relative dating for artifacts.

What was aphrodite childhood like

Answers

e real answer is that Aphrodite had no childhood, she was a god. She was born fully grown with the knowledge of an adult/
I thought Aphrodite was 'born' as an adult?

How did medieval farmers deal with the problem of soil exhaustion

Answers

They stopped farming and growing crops on one location and started growing and farming crops at another location. This enabled the soil to recuperate and gain the required minerals which makes good soil also fertile. 

Answer:

I took poop on you

Explanation: