Answer:
C. Property
Explanation:
According to Max Weber the basis to determine social class is wealthness of the person, political power, status and occupation, from the options in the question the only one that matches is Property. According to Max Weber we need to discover Power, Domination and Communal and Societal Autorithy, whoever is ranking highest in this three is the one that has the highest step in the social hierarchy.
Answer: C. Property
Explanation: I just took the quiz on Ap ex
Based on historical perspective, following the death of King Solomon, the Israelites were divided.
Following the death of King Solomon in Israel, what occurred was that the kingdom was divided into north and south half.
Northern Israel became polytheists and was later invaded by Assyria.
In contrast, Southern Israel continued to worship God and prospered as they dwelled in God.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "the Israelites were divided."
Learn more about King Solomon here: brainly.com/question/262258
B. a share of stock.
C. a treasury bill.
D. a long-term certificate of deposit.
In finance, equity represents an ownership interest in a company, typically in the form of shares of stock. Thus, an example of equity is a share of stock. Treasury bonds, treasury bills, and certificates of deposit are not examples of equity.
In the context of finance and investing, equity typically refers to the ownership interest in a company, which can be represented by shares of stock. Therefore, an example of equity is a share of stock (Option B). It gives the stockholder a claim on a part of the company's assets and profits relative to the amount of shares they hold.
A treasury bond (Option A) and a treasury bill (Option C) are examples of debt securities issued by the government. They don't grant ownership rights but are instead a form of borrowing. A long-term certificate of deposit (Option D) is a time-deposit offered by banks and credit unions, and it's not an example of equity either.
#SPJ6
a. If not, why?
b. If yes, why?
The enterprise that both Dutch and French colonists pursued, was fur-trading, more specifically beaver pelts.
On one hand, when Dutch realized the wealth of furs (specially beaver pelts), they found a reason to claim for the Netherlands, the north part of the Americas. The Dutch named their colony New Netherlands, and used it as a fur trading outpost in order to expand and give power to the Dutch West India Company.
On the other hand, French colonist while exploring the New World fostered friendly relationships with the native locals in order to encourage successful trade. For French colonists at that time, their main interest was establishing commercially viable colonial outpost. And that's why, they relied on native hunters to harvest furs (specially beaver pelts), and to exchange them for some of their French goods.