The Compromise of 1850 did all of the following EXCEPT which one?A. It admitted California as a free state.
B. It enacted a tougher fugitive slave law.
C. It kept slavery in the District of Columbia.
D. It ended the slave trade within the United States.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The Compromise of 1850 did not keep slavery in the District of Columbia, but rather prohibited it.

Explanation:

The five points of the Compromise of 1850 were:

-Texas declined its claims against New Mexico, as well as its claims north of the Missouri Compromise line. They also maintained the Texas Panhandle region and the Federal Government took over their public debt.

-California was admitted as a free State with its current borders.

-The Southerners prevented the adoption of the Wilmot Proviso, which prohibited slavery in any territory acquired as a result of the Mexican-American War and thus in the new territories of Utah and New Mexico slavery was allowed by appealing to the principle of popular sovereignty.

-The slave trade was banned in the District of Columbia.

-A stricter Fugitive Slave Act was promulgated, which established that every black captured would be considered a fugitive slave if a white person claimed it as his own.

Answer 2
Answer:

The Compromise of 1850 did all of the following EXCEPT It ended the slave trade within the United States Therefore the correct option is C.

The Compromise of 1850 was a series of legislative measures aimed at addressing the growing tensions between the free and slave states in the United States. It included provisions such as admitting California as a free state (Option A), enacting a tougher fugitive slave law (Option B), and keeping slavery in the District of Columbia (Option C).

However, the Compromise of 1850 did not end the slave trade within the United States (Option D). The slave trade continued to exist within the country, even though the compromise did attempt to regulate the issue of slavery in newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War and sought to find a balance between the interests of the free and slave states.

Hence the correct option is C.

To know more about Mexican-American War visit:

brainly.com/question/30000817

#SPJ6


Related Questions

Why was French Premier Georges Clemenceau called “The Tiger?”
Which Biblical hero was the subject of this famous bronze statue by Florentine sculptor Donatello? a. Mosesb. Solomonc. Davidd. Abraham
Why do you think western nations fought against the rebels?
What is the heian period in imperial japan
Which of the following describes a similarity between the international response to ethnic violence in Rwanda and Darfur during the 1990s and 2000s?A. The European Union's military intervened in both locations despite global objections. B. The United Nations failed to prevent large-scale genocide in both locations. C. The International Criminal Court tried and executed war criminals in both locations. D. The United States refused to authorize the use of international military force in both locations.

Is this correct ? Or is it b ?

Answers

Answer:

race riots

Explanation:

the steel strike in 1919 was an attempt by the weekend Amalgamated Association of iron,steel and Tin workers (AA) to organize the united states in the wake of the world war 1

During world war 2 , which of the following pairs were axis nations?

Answers

It is most likely Japan and Germany or Germany and Italy

As the war began, the South had more railroads, factories, and people who could fight than the North. a. True
b. False

Answers

This statement is False. The South only had 11 million people, which is only a half compare to the 23 million people that the North had. The North had more people to work on their railroads and factories and grow much more food.

The correct answer is B, as the statement is false.

In the North the great capitalist industry was growing, with a large concentration of salaried labor, in full takeoff and at the doors of the Second Industrial Revolution (to which the war contributed, with the new military technologies such as the battleships or the production of mass weaponry). These bourgeois groups from the north were represented by the new Republican Party, of a liberal nationalist type, which sought the implementation of protectionist policies.

On the other hand, the South remained anchored in an economic system that was unfavorable to capitalist development (mechanization and hiring of workers was cheaper than the maintenance of slaves). The Democratic Party would be the defender of slavery. This party had led the great expansion of the country to the south (activism in favor of the annexation of Mexican territory) and now stood as representative of the southern elites, which sought fundamentally the extension of the slave system and free trade for the export of raw materials and the importation of manufactured goods without barriers.

Fundamental aspects of democracy include all of the following EXCEPT:a.
a literate public
c.
a healthy economy
b.
an elite ruling class
d.
active citizen participation

Answers

Answer: b. an elite ruling class

The fundamental aspects of democracy include a literate public, a healthy economy and an active citizen participation in all the state's activities. The existence of an elite ruling  class is not a characteristic of a democratic country.

What are two events that caused Americans to become disillusioned with the Federal government during the first half of the '70s? a scandal involving Spiro Agnew giving recognition to Red China the election of Gerald Ford the pardon of Richard Nixon

Answers

General Ford,became VP after Spiro Agnew resigned (this includes the bribery scandal!!!) and became president after Watergate scandal forced Nixon in August 1974, he pardoned Nixon and pushed a very forceful conservative domestic policy, but was way more than a caretaker president when the respect for government was at an all-time low, thus being said, Spiro Agnew was only the beginning but it was the election of General Ford, and the pardon of Richard Nixon that really set America on edge! Hope this was helpful, have a great day!

Why is it important for historians to study historiography

Answers

One main reason why it is important for historians to study historiography is because this allows the historian to discover what has already been "answered" about a particular topic, and what they can do specifically to add to the preexisting body of knowledge.