Adolf Hitler
Benito Mussolini
David Lloyd George
Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Japanese Americans returned to their homes.
Executive Order 9022 was overturned.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was that internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Korematsu v. United States was one of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, where compliance with the Executive Order 9066 was considered, according to which Japanese-Americans were obliged to relocate to internment camps during the Second World War, regardless of their citizenship.
By a decision of 6 judges against 3, the Supreme Court agreed with the government, declaring that the order complies with the Constitution. The decision made by Judge Hugo Black ruled that the need for protection against espionage outweighed the individual rights of Fred Korematsu, as well as the rights of other Americans of Japanese origin.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was the affirmation of the constitutionality of Japanese American internment during World War II, setting a controversial precedent for potential civil rights violations during times of national security.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was:
1. Japanese Americans were not allowed to return to their homes immediately after the ruling. The internment camps were not immediately disbanded.
2. The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, validating the government's actions based on military necessity.
3. Discrimination and racial profiling against Japanese Americans continued, despite the ruling.
4. The decision set a precedent that allowed the government to potentially justify the violation of civil rights during times of national security or military conflict.
5. The ruling remained controversial and was widely criticized for its infringement on civil liberties, eventually leading to calls for its reconsideration and efforts to overturn it. However, the specific Executive Order 9022 was not directly affected by the ruling.
Learn more on Korematsu v. United States here;
#SPJ6
The Knights of Labor aimed for inclusivity and social reform, while the American Federation of Labor focused on representing skilled workers and negotiating with employers.
A major difference between the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor was their approach to organizing workers. The Knights of Labor aimed to create a broadly inclusive union that encompassed both skilled and unskilled workers, as well as women and minorities. They focused on social reforms and believed in using strikes and boycotts to achieve their goals.
On the other hand, the American Federation of Labor was more selective and only accepted skilled workers into their union. They prioritized representing the immediate economic interests of their members, such as higher wages and better working conditions. They advocated for collective bargaining and negotiation with employers rather than direct confrontation.
Overall, while both organizations aimed to improve workers' conditions, the Knights of Labor had a broader vision of social change, while the American Federation of Labor focused primarily on economic gains for its members.
#SPJ2
b It gave the president power to enforce congressional laws.
c It required that each state be given an equal vote.
d It required unanimous consent of states to be amended.
Answer:
b) It gave the president power to enforce congressional laws.
I JUST DID THE TEST AND ITS RIGHT!!!
Answer:
The prince is a sixteenth-century political treatise of the Italian diplomat and political theorist Nicolás Machiavelli. The prince is sometimes said to be one of the first works of modern philosophy, especially political philosophy, in which the effective truth is considered to be more important than any abstract ideal. It was also in direct conflict with the dominant Catholic and scholastic doctrines of the time with respect to politics and ethics.
Although it is relatively short, the treatise is the most memorable of Machiavelli's works and he is responsible for putting the word "Machiavellian" in use as a pejorative. It even contributed to the modern negative connotations of the words "political" and "political" in Western countries. In terms of matter, it overlays with the much longer Discourses on the first decade of Livy, which was written a few years later.
The descriptions within The Prince have the general theme of accepting that princely goals, such as glory and survival, can justify the use of immoral means to achieve those ends.