The Gregorian method derives paschal full moon dates by determining the epact for each year .
I hope that's help !
B. Amendment I.
C. Amendment II.
D. Amendment VI.
The question options are :
A.) A person should be quiet in hospital hallways. This is a hospital hallway; I should be quiet
B.) An injured dog may whine. My dg Fluffy is whining; Fluffy may be injured.
C.) This piece of furniture is a chair. This chair is soft; all chairs are soft.
D.) Inductive reasoning begins with one example. Counter examples may exist; inductive reasoning is unreliable.
I think that the answer is C because it is the only one that doesn't really make sense.
B) Dill
C) Jem
D) Tom
E) Robinson
Answer:
C) Jem speaking to Scout
Explanation:
The passage being written in the question is a passage from the novel called "To Kill a MockingBird". This is a novel written by American Novelist Nelle Harper Lee, and was first published on July 11, 1960. In this passage the individual who was making this statement was Jem and was talking to Scout.
Answer:
Austria and Hungary
Explanation:
The Habsburg Dynasty was the ruling house of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This empire sided with the Central Powers of Germany, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire during World War I. Defeats early in the war caused Austria-Hungary to rely more and more on Germany as an ally. The defeat of the Germany, as well as widespread economic troubles, caused a rapid weakening of the empire. Following the end of the war, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was dissolved, making way for the creation of new countries such as Hungary, Austria, and Czechoslovakia.
I believe the answer is:
express weakness
.reveal a problem.
admit an error
The indirectness could be done by showing in through non-verbal method. For example, people tend to snap and direct the conversation to attack their partner for their weakness in order to hide their own. such method tend to be really destructive for relationships, regardless it's the romantic one or not.
According to Deborah Tannen's research, men commonly use indirectness in conversations to assert their social status, in contrast to women who tend to use conversation for fostering social connections via more direct communication. These patterns are not universally applicable and can be influenced by many factors including cultural norms and personal upbringing.
According to Deborah Tannen, men are more likely to use indirectness when they are asserting their status in a social hierarchy. Tannen, in her research, posited that men and women belong to two different communicative subcultures. Men engage in conversation primarily to establish their position in the social order, which might evoke less direct forms of communication. This contrast with women who, Tannen suggests, use conversation more to foster solidarity and social connections, often employing a more direct style of speech.
Despite these generalizations, it's important to remember that not all men or women conform strictly to these patterns. Some men demonstrate a great deal of sensitivity and respect towards power dynamics in their conversations, just as some women may assert their status. Conversational styles can be influenced by many factors, including cultural norms, personal upbringing, and context, aside from gender.
#SPJ3