Find the product of 8x93 using distributive property. Show the steps and the solution
Answers
Hello there!
Take 3(6+7)
. We can add within the parentheses, and then multiply:
3(6+7)=3(13)=39
Or, you can multiply each addend by the 3
, and then add.
3(6+7)=3(6)+3(7)=18+21=39
Either way, you get the same answer.
Hope this helped!
HyperZ ^_^
Explanation:
Distributive property: →
Multiply by the numbers from left to right.
Then, you can also divide into the numbers.
Product it's going to be multiply by the numbers, fractions, factors, and multiples.
Hope this helps!
Thanks!
Have a great day!
Related Questions
What is the volume of a four- sided pyramid with base edge of 5 ft and h = 4 ft.
angel has a total of 97 dimes and nickels. if the total value of the coins is $8.35, how many dimes does he have
Mike is three times as old as his little sister, Mary. In 4 years, he will be twice as old as Mary. How old is Mary?
What is a slope of a line that passes through the points -2,5 and 1,4
Answers
Formula = a * 10^-n
0.0008235 in scientific notation
=> 8.235 * 10^-n
There are 3 0s from the left side of the numbers and going to the decimal point.
So, we're gonna move 3 to the left
=> 8.235 * 10^-3.
Negative because it is a decimal number.
Answer: the actual answer would be 8.235 x 10^-4
Step-by-step explanation:
bc you move it 4 places not 3
{x | x R, x > -7}
{x | x R, x > -3}
{x | x R, x > 3}
{x | x R, x > 7}
Answers
x-5+5>-2+5
x>3
{x l x R, x > 3}
{x | x R, x > -7} Is the answer
Answers
Final answer:
Brad's statement is incorrect because an increase of 25% does not correspond to a decrease of 25%. The percentages are calculated relative to the base number, so the percentage value changes when the base number changes.
Explanation:
No, Brad's statement is incorrect. If one number is 125% of another number, it does not mean that the first number is 75% of the second number. Let's use an example to illustrate this.
Let's assume the first number is 4. According to Brad's first statement, a second number that is 125% of the first number would be 5 (because 125% of 4 is 5). Now, if we apply Brad's second statement and calculate 75% of the second number (which is 5), we get 3.75, not 4. So, the first number can't be 75% of the second number.
This is because percentage increase and decrease are not symmetrical. An increase of 25% does not correspond to a decrease of 25%. In mathematics, percentages are calculated relative to the base number. So, if the base number changes, the percentage value will also change.
Learn more about Percentage Calculations here:
#SPJ12
Final answer:
Brad's statement is incorrect. If a second number is 125% of a first number, the first number is actually 80%, not 75%, of the second number. Calculation of percents involves creating equivalent fractions with denominators of 100.
Explanation:
No, Brad is incorrect. If a second number is 125% of the first number, it means the first number is 80% of the second number, not 75%. This can be easily demonstrated with simple math:
- Let's assume the first number is 100. Then, the second number is 125% of 100, which is 125.
- If we now take 75% of the second number (75% of 125), we get 93.75, not 100. So, the first number is not 75% of the second number.
Calculating percents involves using equivalent fractions that represent ratios where the denominator is 100.
Learn more about Percent Calculations here:
#SPJ11
What is a decimal that is equivalent to the fraction 50/100
?
Answers
Answer:
0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answers
You said that A = (s-2) 180
Divide each side by 180 : A/180 = s-2
Add 2 to each side: A/180 + 2 = s
A = (s)180 - (2)180
A = 180s - 360 (add 360 to each side)
A + 360 = 180s - 360 + 360
A + 360 = 180s (divide 180 from each side)
(A + 360)/180 = s
s =
show your work please.
Answers
Answer:
$12825
Step-by-step explanation:
If the amount is 1.500 and intrest rate 4.00% and we have 5 years to invenst then that gives us $12.825