Answer:
Healthy
Explanation:
Just took it on Edge
All the cost sums up to $4,000 when there is no extra charge. In this case, the opportunity cost is the same with the total cost. In this case Mikael is willing to forgo $4,000 for this opportunity and it makes his opportunity cost. However, since the transportation expenses become $1,200 instead of $1,000. We don't know exactly he buys this ticket or not, but since it is said that "while he was booking", we have to consider that he buys the ticket. The hotel costs $1,500 and it cannot be redeemed. However, $2,700 is a sunk cost, not an opportunity cost. Because in this case, Mikael does not have any alternative. He gave up from his decision in the end.
The cost of opportunity in this scenario is Mikael decision to the forgo seeing Ouro Preto during his stay in the Brazil.
Cost of Opportunity is refers to the decision making process people use in the terms of how they spend their times, money or resources. This term was refers to the loss that a person suffer by picking a certain options. In this case, does't want Mikael to cut his foods budget. Instead, he pick to skip visiting Ouro Preto. So this represents how the Mikael is losing out on seeing this site in order to eat the food he wants while on the vacation.
All the cost of the sum up to the $4,000 when there are no extra charge. On this case, opportunity cost is the same as the total cost. In this case, Mikael is willing to the forgo $4,000 for this opportunity and it make his opportunity cost. So, since the transportation expenses become $1,200 rather than of $1,000. We don't know to exactly if he buy this ticket or not, but since it is said that "while he was booking", we have to consider that he buys ticket. The hotel costs $1,500 and it cannot be redeemed. However, $2,700 is the sunk the cost, not an opportunity cost. Because in this case, Mikael does not have any alternative. He gave up on his decision in the end.
Learn more about opportunitycosts here brainly.com/question/12121515
#SPJ2
b. The number of tobacco users has decreased.
c. The number of tobacco users has not changed.
d. The number of adolescent tobacco users decreased, while the number of adult users increased.
I choose letter b. The number of tobacco users has decreased. With the price on tobacco increasing, it discourages smokers from buying the product. That combined with anti-tobacco campaign ads helps decrease tobacco use as consumers realize the dangers it poses to their health.
The impact of high taxes on tobacco products on the number of people who use them is that: B. the number of tobacco users has decreased.
Taxation can be defined as the involuntary but compulsoryfees that are imposed by the government on both individuals, business firms, products or services in a particular country, so as to generate revenues for funding public projects.
As a result of the imposition of high taxes on tobacco products by the government, the number of people who use these products would decrease significantly.
Read more on taxes here: brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ5
Answer:
For Blue fill in the dot with the word over top Absorbed.
For Pink fill in the dot with the word overtop Reflected.
Explanation:
Blue is absorbing the waves because it is in the background.
Pink is reflecting and getting absorbed because it is the waves because of the arrows.
Loves,
If you have any questions just ask.
Have a great day! :)
Answer:
House
Explanation:
laissez-faire economy
B.
free enterprise economy
C.
socialist economy
D.
market economy