Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Japanese Americans returned to their homes.
Executive Order 9022 was overturned.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was that internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Korematsu v. United States was one of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, where compliance with the Executive Order 9066 was considered, according to which Japanese-Americans were obliged to relocate to internment camps during the Second World War, regardless of their citizenship.
By a decision of 6 judges against 3, the Supreme Court agreed with the government, declaring that the order complies with the Constitution. The decision made by Judge Hugo Black ruled that the need for protection against espionage outweighed the individual rights of Fred Korematsu, as well as the rights of other Americans of Japanese origin.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was the affirmation of the constitutionality of Japanese American internment during World War II, setting a controversial precedent for potential civil rights violations during times of national security.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was:
1. Japanese Americans were not allowed to return to their homes immediately after the ruling. The internment camps were not immediately disbanded.
2. The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, validating the government's actions based on military necessity.
3. Discrimination and racial profiling against Japanese Americans continued, despite the ruling.
4. The decision set a precedent that allowed the government to potentially justify the violation of civil rights during times of national security or military conflict.
5. The ruling remained controversial and was widely criticized for its infringement on civil liberties, eventually leading to calls for its reconsideration and efforts to overturn it. However, the specific Executive Order 9022 was not directly affected by the ruling.
Learn more on Korematsu v. United States here;
#SPJ6
b. Because unemployment statistics can determine whether the country is in a period of inflation
c. Because unemployment statistics can predict whether the price of stocks will increase
d. Because unemployment statistics are an indicator of the deflation rate of currency
The correct answer is A.
The unemployment level is one of the most important macroeconomic indicators, and it is carefully studied by statistics. The unemployment figures are closely related to the aggregate demand levels and to the total output produced in a country during a specific period of time (GDP). Therefore, it is one of the variables that influences economic growth trends and the business cycle.
When unemployment figures grow, it means that there are less people producing and earning a salary and, therefore, willing to consume. There will be, very likely, a contraction of the GDP and negative economic growth.
1. People in that country can do whatever they want because they are free to do so.
2. The result is lack of discipline and the government will not do anything about it,
3. The people has the power to chose who will govern the country and this situation can be manipulated by offering money especially in underprivileged areas.
John of Leyden:
Henry VIII:
Elizabeth I:
Answer:
Henry Vlll
Explanation:
I did the quiz/assignment
The correct answer for this question is C