Goods that are regarded as substitutes for each other, like fried chicken and hamburgers, are what kind of goods

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Goods that are regarded as substitutes for each other are alternative goods.

Answer 2

Answer: Goods that are substitutes for each other are known as substitute goods. Goods that are typically bought together are complementary goods.
Hope that helped =)

Related Questions

_____ elections are those held between presidential elections, involving all seats in the house of representatives, one-third of those in the senate, thirty-six governorships, and other positions.
In terms of growth of the United States which is Jefferson's greatest legacy
How did the fall of Constantinople in 1453 change the economy in Europe?
What was one reason the Battle of Barbarossa became a turning point in the war?
Why were americans in the 1990s concerned about outsourcing?

After the French and Indian war Americans west of the Appalachian mountainsThe answer is

They wanted the French to return and protect them

Answers

Answer:

..................... ........

Explanation:

.........

What obstacles did the united mine workers face

Answers

The two main obstacles that United Sates mine workers faced were 1) Very dangerous conditions, in which many people lost their lives, and 2) A lack of good and reliable pay for their labor.

Which are symbolic representations on statues of Buddha

Answers

a bump on head, long earlobes, heavy-lidded eyes

B.a bump on head, long earlobes, heavy-lidded eyes

A meander is best described as a

Answers

A meander is best described as a river or stream that has eroded its banks such that it no longer flows in a relatively straight path, but rather is a winding (perhaps S-shaped) path.

Which of the following was a factor that contributed to the formation of the People’s Party in 1891?

Answers

A factor that contributed to the formation of the People's Party in 1891 was that farmers wanted a political party that would represent their interests and wants.

Answer:

Farmers wanted a political party that represented their interests.

Explanation:

Which best summarizes the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education?Public school choice was no longer legal.

Separate but equal schools were inherently unequal and unconstitutional.

School curriculum must include information on the civil rights movement.

The principle of separate but equal schools was acceptable

Answers

The correct answer is: "Separate but equal schools were inherently unequal and unconstitutional".

Brown v. Board of Education was a case dicussed by the US Supreme Court, which led to the enactment of a landmark decision in 1954.

The case was about the constitutionality of the "separate but equal" principle that was accepted in a former decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 in the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Such decision allowed the proliferation of segregated schools under the belief that, if facilities were equal in quality, such education system was not violating the equality of rights provision that had been guaranteed for all US citizens by the Reconstruction Amendments to the US Constitution.

Brown v. Board of Education overturned the abovementioned previous Supreme Court decision and declared segregation unconstitutional, claming that, in practice, it actually deprived black students. The court published a deadline and all public schools nationwide had to abolish such practice and to adopt racial integration.