Answer:
c. It will have negative consequences.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: power to use judicial review to determine whether a law is constitutional
In marbury v. Madison, the court established that the American courts has the power strike down laws, statutes, and executive actions that contravene the U.S. Constitution.
The 'judicial review' process is carried out to interpret the words written within the constitution, which become the basis to allow or disallow the strike down.
Marbury v. Madison affirmed the Supreme Court's power of judicial review, establishing the right to declare laws unconstitutional, thereby ensuring a system of checks and balances.
The 1803 court case of Marbury v. Madison is a landmark case in U.S. history. This case affirmed the power of judicial review held by the Supreme Court. In this case, the Supreme Court gave itself the power to declare laws unconstitutional, asserting that it has the final say over the constitutionality of laws. Therefore, Marbury v. Madison served to establish the System of Checks and Balances that we still observe today.
#SPJ6
Answer:
(C) Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Explanation:
In 1965, a case between three teenagers who wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war and were subsequently suspended for failing to remove the armbands and Des Moines Independent Community School District appeared before the Supreme Court. In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court explained that all form of speech, both symbolic speech such as the protest with armbands are protected under the the first amendment right of freedom of speech and expression. The court concluded that freedom of speech includes as form of symbolic speech.
b. False
The answer is true. Have a nice day.
Answer:
direct and representative democracy, constitutional monarchy
Explanation: