Which of these explains why there is greater variation in the teachings of Buddhism than in those of Hinduism?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Siddhartha Gautama never wrote down his teachings. In contrast, a large body of sacred texts underlies hindu beliefs and traditions. There is therefore less variation in Hinduism's teachings than those of Buddhism.

Related Questions

The economy of early civilizations was based around
What modern First Lady wore a bejeweled American Flag in her lapel on every Fourth of July? Pat Nixon, Jackie Kennedy, Hillary Clinton Betty Ford?
Which was an important event in the rise of the communist party in china.PLEASE I NEED AN ANSWER QUICK!!
Who wrote On the Road?Allen Ginsberg James Dean Allan Freed Jack Kerouac
After the war with Mexico, the territorial status was defined as the following.a. If admitted as states to the Union they had to be free of slavery. c. Popular will could decide the status of the Utah and New Mexico territory. b. If admitted as states to the Union they had to be slave states. d. None of the territories applied for statehood.

Which Roman ruler organized the administration of the provinces, lowered taxes, gave land to the poor, and established the calendar that is still used today? A. Octavian B. Nero C. Cincinnatus D. Julius Caesar

Answers

The Roman ruler organized the administration of the provinces, lowered taxes, gave land to the poor, and established the calendar that is still used today is Octavian. Gaius Octavius, was the first in the family to wind up plainly a representative, however, kicked the bucket when Octavian was just four. It was his mom who had the more recognized association. She was the little girl of Julia, sister to Julius Caesar.

Answer:

The answer is A. Octavian

According to what agreement would the United States have to declare war against any nation that attacked Great Britain? A.Warsaw Pact
B.Marshall Plan
C.Declaration of Human Rights
D.the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D.the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." According to the agreement would the United States have to declare war against any nation that attacked Great Britain is that D.the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

D.the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

NATO was an agreement by member nations to defend one another in the case of an attack.

NATO was created in 1949 and was an agreement between the US and 11 European nations. The defensive agreement brought together the western powers and was meant to protect the countries. The pact threatened the USSR and they responded with a defensive pact called the Warsaw Pact.

The committee [of the South Carolina Legislature] have bestowed on the subjects referred to them the deliberate attention which their importance demands; and the result, on full investigation, is a unanimous opinion that the act of Congress of the last session, with the whole system of legislation imposing duties on imports, not for revenue, but the protection of one branch of industry at the expense of others, is unconstitutional, unequal, and oppressive, and calculated to corrupt the public virtue and destroy the liberty of the country; which propositions they propose to consider in the order stated, and then to conclude their report with the consideration of the important question of the remedy.South Carolina Exposition and Protest

1. What issue does the South Carolina legislature have with Congress?
2. What region(s) of the country would agree with this message?
3. What region(s) of the country would disagree?
4. Does this document support the American System? How do you Know?
5. H
6. I
7. P
8. P

Answers

Answer: The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, also known as Calhoun's Exposition, was written in December 1828 by John C. Calhoun who was the Vice President of the United States under John Quincy Adams. Although Calhoun did not initially put his name to the writings, it was widely suspected and later confirmed. The document was a protest against the Tariff of 1828(Tariff of Abominations). It also stated the idea that a state has the right to reject federal law.

Explanation: The answers are:

1. The last session is unconstitutional

2. The South

3. The North

4. Yes, because it imposes duties on imports

5. Election of 1828: Jackson VS Adams

6. Explains the Whig's views on taxing imports

7. Whigs Party

8. Tax on imports were unconstituional

Final answer:

The South Carolina Legislature is challenging Congress' act of imposing duties, perceived as biased and oppressive. The North, being more industrial, probably would not agree with this, while the South would. The critique of protective tariffs indicates disapproval of the American System.

Explanation:

The issues that the South Carolina Legislature has with Congress in this text pertains to the act of Congress imposing duties on imports for the protection of one industry at the cost of others. They found it to be unconstitutional, unequal, and oppressive. Regions supporting industrial growth and manufacturing, particularly the North, may disagree with South Carolina's position, while agrarian-based economies, especially in the South, would likely agree with South Carolina due to the heavy burden tariffs placed on their economy. Furthermore, this document does not support the American System because this system advocated for tariffs to protect and encourage American industry, an approach that the South Carolina Legislature is criticizing.

Learn more about South Carolina Legislature's Opposition here:

brainly.com/question/35433234

#SPJ12

In the early 1900s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People strongly pushed for federal legislation to

Answers

In the early 1900s, the national association for the advancement of colored people strongly pushed for federal legislation to ban the practice of Lynching

Back then, the practice of Lynching was created to intimidate minority groups int he society, which is a very direct form of Discrimination

correct answer is A. I JUST TOOK THE TEST

Critically discuss the reason for the 1929 Wall Street stock crash as well the economic and social impact of the crash in USA.

Answers

Basically, the reason of the 1929 wall street stock crash was economic imbalances and structural failings, which caused the companies were not able to pay off their Debts. The crashes directly resulted in the Great Depression , in which the people in United States really hard to find a job.


"The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest breaks up the foundations of society."—Thomas Jefferson Which of the following statements both relates to the quote above and supports it?

Answers

The rule of law is an essential principle in the nation but not nearly as important as the idea of majority rule.The rule of law is the most important principle in the nation where votes of the majority determine the laws.The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all.The rule of the majority is the only principle on which this nation should run in order to protect democracy.
OR
Jefferson was Anti Fed, so he wanted maajority rule and less central government. but later in his second term, he kept some of hamilton's financial programs (which were heavily federalist), but following the quote, I would say d.


Answer:

C: The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all.

Explanation:

Took the quiz