Answer: The Glorious Revolution showed that the people could pursue a change of ruling power.
Explanation/context:
English philosopher John Locke wrote his Second Treatise on Civil Government in the wake of the Glorious Revolution, advocating that the people had the right to change a government if the government was not properly serving the people whom it governed. Leaders in the American colonies became fans of the philosophy of John Locke, and believed they had the right to pursue a change in government and free themselves from control of Great Britain.
The Glorious Revolution in England was led by members of Parliament against King James II, who had tried to assert greater power and control for himself as king, infringing on their rights. The "revolution" was a change in government, mostly without violence. In June of 1688, seven highly-placed Englishmen sent a letter of invitation to William of Orange (who was husband to James II's daughter Mary), inviting him to come to England and be supported by them and the people as king. As king and queen, the new rulers of England became known as William III and Mary II.
The American Revolution, launched with the Declaration of Independence in 1776, was similar in that it was seeking to free America from unfair government imposed on the colonies by the British home government. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson listed "facts to be submitted to a candid world" to demonstrate that the British king had been seeking to establish "an absolute Tyranny over these States."
Answer:
Samuel de Champlain established the first successful French settlement.
Explanation:
When most of the European nations were founding colonies in the New World, France decided to send its voyages in New World to seek a route to the Pacific Ocean and wealth. French send several expeditions and tried to settle in the New World but failed due to weather, disease, and hostile Indians. Samuel de Champlain became the first to establish colonies as Quebec and New France. Most colonies develop to export products such as furs, fish, rise and other natural products.
When Caesar Augustus came to power in Rome, the Republic came to an end. The Roman Republic was a worn-out institution, where civil wars and dictatorships had worn away the power and credibility of the Senate. Governance was impossible. When Caesar Octavianus (his original name), who had already been part of an earlier dictatorship called the Second Triumvirate, assumed as Consul, the Senate (pressured by Roman society, which esteemed him from his dictatorial era) granted him the sum of public power and the title of Augustus. In this way, the transition of the Republic to the Roman Empire occurred, being Caesar Augustus the first Roman emperor.
National Bank veto
Maysville Road veto
political participation
constitutional government
Specie Circular
Answer:
Nullification Crisis
The nullification crisiswas a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government. It ensued after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state.
National Bank veto
veto According to the History Channel, President Andrew Jackson vetoed a new charter for the Second Bank of the United States because the bank was heavily biased toward business interests and had no congressional oversight. This bias led the bank to not support western expansion, which Jackson favored. Jackson also felt that the bank was too powerful, both politically and economically.
Maysville Road veto
The Maysville Road veto occurred on May 27, 1830, when United States President Andrew Jackson vetoed a bill that would allow the federal government to purchase stock in the Maysville, Washington, Paris, and Lexington Turnpike Road Company, which had been organized to construct a road linking Lexington, Kentucky, to Maysville on the Ohio River, the entirety of which would be in the state of Kentucky. Its advocates regarded it as a part of the national Cumberland Road system. Congress passed a bill in 1830 providing federal funds to complete the project. Jackson vetoed the bill on the grounds that federal funding of intrastate projects of this nature was unconstitutional. He declared that such bills violated the principle that the federal government should not be involved in local economic affairs. Jackson also pointed out that funding for these kinds of projects interfered with paying off the national debt.
Explanation: good luck !