Which of the following best explains how human activities can directly contribute to landslides?

Answer:

hi and its carbon im taking a quiz over it aswell

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct answer is the b-by polluting near by streams with pesticides and herbicides option

Explanation:

Hello!

let's solve this!

Agriculture is helping to reduce biodiversity since with the use of herbicides and pesticides, living things can no longer feed. Also when placed near streams, they also contribute to pollute the waters.

The correct answer is the b-by polluting near by streams with pesticides and herbicides option

Answer:

Explanation:

Long answer: The scientific method is a systematic approach used by scientists to investigate and understand natural phenomena. It involves a series of steps designed to ensure that observations are accurate, experiments are well-controlled, and conclusions are valid. Here are the basic steps of the scientific method:

Observation: Begin by making observations about a specific phenomenon or problem. This could involve noticing something interesting, unusual, or puzzling in the natural world.

Research: Conduct background research to gather information and knowledge about the topic. This helps you understand what is already known and identify gaps in knowledge.

Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis, which is a proposed explanation for the observed phenomenon. A good hypothesis should be specific, clear, and capable of being tested through experimentation.

Experimentation: Design and conduct experiments to test your hypothesis. This involves manipulating variables, collecting data, and making careful observations. Experiments should be well-controlled to ensure that the results are reliable.

Data Collection: Collect and record data from your experiments. This may involve measurements, observations, or other forms of data depending on the nature of your research.

Analysis: Analyze the data you collected to determine if it supports or contradicts your hypothesis. Use statistical methods and tools to draw meaningful conclusions from the data.

Conclusion: Based on your analysis, draw a conclusion about whether your hypothesis is supported or not. If the results do not support your hypothesis, consider alternative explanations and further research.

Communicate: Share your findings with the scientific community and the public. This can be done through research papers, presentations, conferences, and other forms of communication.

Peer Review: Submit your work to scientific journals for peer review, where experts in the field evaluate the validity and quality of your research.

Repeat and Refine: Science is an ongoing process. If your hypothesis is supported, you may want to conduct additional experiments to further validate your findings. If it's not supported, you might refine your hypothesis, design new experiments, and continue investigating.

It's important to note that while these steps provide a general framework for the scientific method, the process is not always linear or strictly sequential. Scientists often go back and forth between steps as they refine their hypotheses, design experiments, and analyze results. The scientific method is a dynamic process that encourages curiosity, critical thinking, and a willingness to revise and expand our understanding of the natural world.

Short answer:

Observe: Notice something interesting or puzzling in the world.

Research: Gather information about the topic.

Hypothesize: Propose a testable explanation for what you observed.

Experiment: Design and conduct controlled experiments.

Collect Data: Measure and record information from your experiments.

Analyze: Study the data to draw conclusions.

Conclude: Determine if your hypothesis is supported by the data.

Communicate: Share your findings with others.

Refine: If needed, revise your hypothesis and repeat the process.

Remember, the scientific method is a flexible guide that helps scientists explore and understand the natural world.

Answer:

Option B, Mass

Explanation:

The general relation that gives the relationship between the lumonisity of a star and its mass is

Thus, suppose if the mass of any star is two times the mass of sun then its luminosity will be 100 times the luminosity of sun.

The general relation between luminosity and temperature is

Since luminosity is depended on mass, and temperature is dependent on luminosity , thus it can be said that temperature is also dependent on mass of a star.

Thus, option B is correct.