In which areas did Franklin Roosevelt’s programs increase the power and role of the federal government?A.
the lives of citizens and religious organizations





B.
government ownership of business and industry





C.
the economy and the lives of citizens





D.
the economy of the U.S. and of other countries

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The answer is he helped the economy of lives of the citizens!

Explanation:

Thank you and have a nice day! Stay Safe!

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

B and C. FDR was elected during the Great depression and he invested $300m into many banks so they could repay the people (Emergence Relief Act), but that failed. He agreed to introduce new governmental programs but all this failed.

he also authorized to dispense $2 billion – supposed to have trickle-down effect.  That failed too though. So yeah, Answers B and C. If you are supposed to choose only one, I'd choose C

It's not A, because nothing was specifically going toward a certain race or religion and it's not D because the Dawes plan (US paying money to Germany so they could repay the allies after WW1) failed and they didn't get the money back and the Germans kept it to build their nation back up)


Related Questions

The average Farm in the u.s. is how many times as large as the average Farm in Japan
When you are reviewing the conventions in an essay, what are you looking for?Spelling, grammar, and usage Transitions and organization Unnecessary sentences Wording and variety of language
What are the responsibilities and powers of the Supreme Court? (Site 1)
A type of questioning that encourages students to think for themselves
Give some examples of information early civilizations recorded in writing.

Which was NOT a provision of the intolerable actsa.The British prohibited the Massachusetts colonists from having town meetings.

b.The British required colonists to possess identification at all times

c.the British required citizens in all the colonies to house and feed British soldiers

d.the British closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the tea that was destroyed in the Boston tea party

Answers

B because its more likley

Which explains why the United States went to war with Mexico in 1846

Answers

The Mexican military attacked the American forces stationed in Texas. President Polk's declaration of war stated that Mexico, "invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon American soil".

Once there is a surplus of food what does that allow people to do

Answers

more generally speaking: it allows people to do other things than pursue food. This is very important because in the first years of humanity people spent almost all their time looking for food.

A surplus of food means people can get organised in bigger hierarchical groups, and that some people can devote themselves to other tasks, such as ruling, art, improving technology. This is what contributes to the development of civilizations.

What was the poverty rate in the United States during 2017 and how many people are included?

Answers

The poverty rate in United States during 2017 includes 39.7 million people  which is as similar as the statistics of poverty in 2016.

Explanation:

12.3% is the rate of poverty officially in 2017 which is reduced by 0.4% when compared to 2016. This shows is the 3rd consecutive decline in poverty rate annually.

During the period of 2016 to 2017, the poverty people number decreased for people living in the West, in families, outside metropolitan cities and for all workers who worked part-time along with people with disability, with high school diploma but no or some college degree.

Answer:The official poverty rate in 2017 was 12.3 percent, down 0.4 percentage points from 12.7 percent in 2016. This is the third consecutive annual decline in poverty.

Explanation:

In a professional work setting we are faced with many decisions that are much more difficult than the decision to select the correct answer on a multiple choice test. Select which of the three (3) styles for decision-making on the job is your strongest and why: Reflexive, Reflective or Consistent.

Answers

A score of 10 to 16 indicates a reflexive style; 17 to 23 indicates a consistent style; and 24 to 30 indicates a reflective style. You have determined your preferred personal decision-making style. Groups also have a preferred decision-making style, based on how their members make decisions. Changing the I to we, you could answer the 10 questions to refer to a group rather than to yourself.Reflexive StyleA reflexive decision maker likes to make quick decisions ("to shootfrom the hip"), without taking the time to get all the information that may be needed and without considering all alternatives. On the positive side, reflexive decision makers are decisive; they do not procrastinate. On the negative side, making quick decisions can lead to waste and duplication when a decision is not the best possible alternative. The reflexive decision maker may be viewed by employees as a poor manager if he or she isconsistently making bad decisions. If you use a reflexive style, you may want to slow down and spend more time gathering information and analyzing alternatives. Following the steps in the decision-making model can help you develop your skills.Reflective StyleA reflective decision maker likes to take plenty of time to make decisions, taking into account considerable information and an analysis of several alternatives. On the positive side, the reflective type does not make decisions that are rushed. On the negative side, tic or she may procrastinate and waste valuable time and other resources

Do you believe warfare should be used to gain more territory and achieve national interests?

Answers

Answer:

I do not believe.

Explanation:

The notion of war is related to terms such as combat, battle, fight, fight or confrontation. In general, all of these concepts are interchangeable and synonymous, although each has a specific use that best fits the case. Independent of the concept, war only causes destruction, suffering and despair. No one gains territory, nor does it reach national interests in the face of war, quite the opposite. In a war only public money, prosperity, lives, peace and any other factor of happiness in the lives of citizens are lost.

yes i do it is needed to protect citizens and let them keep there rights and protect its women and children