Key American intellectuals and political theorists who advocated for the scrapping of the Articles of Confederation included Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, Robert Morris, James Wilson, Gouverneur Morris, and James Duane. They were known as nationalists, who expressed major concerns about the weak financial health of the republic and the lack of federal power, especially the power to tax, under the Articles of Confederation. Their efforts led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which resulted in the formation of the U.S. Constitution.
The major American intellectuals and political theorists who argued for the scraping of the Articles of Confederation were referred to as nationalists who advocated for a stronger federal government. This group included Alexander Hamilton, who was Washington's chief of staff, James Madison, a planter from Virginia, Robert Morris, a wealthy merchant from Pennsylvania, and James Wilson, a lawyer from Pennsylvania. Other notable figures who joined this effort were Gouverneur Morris and James Duane from New York.
The nationalists expressed major concerns about the financial health of the republic in the 1780s and argued that the national government needed greater power, especially the power to tax. Their views were grounded in the financial struggles and conflict under the Articles of Confederation that had resulted in dire circumstances such as the debtor uprising known as Shays' Rebellion.
The nationalist cause eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where delegates from all states, except Rhode Island, gathered to find a solution to the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. It represented a significant turning point in American History, leading to the formulation of the U.S. Constitution.
#SPJ12
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution instructs the Legislative Branch to “provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.” This week the House of Representatives upheld our Constitutional responsibility with the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
Hoped that helped:)
The correct answer is: "suffragettes"
The Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) was a movement integrated only by women that functioned in the UK between 1903 and 1917, claiming for voting rights for women. They used civil disobedience and direct action techniques to make the demands visible: they organized demonstration, broke glass in official buildings, did hunger strikes, occupied houses and churches, etc.
The women that constituted this movement were known as suffragettes.
The correct answer is C) the paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
The factor that could have led to this conclusion was that the paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
A historian published on the Ancient Greek leader Alexander the Great. However, most scholars reject his paper on the basis that research is not reliable. So the factor that could have led to this conclusion was that the paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
A professional historian must perform an impeccable job in their papers. It knows that the citation of reliable sources and impartiality are going to validate its work. If those elements do not exist in the research, scholars are going to reject the results of the research.
The other options of the question were, a) the historian chose a subject that was unpopular, b) the paper credited too many sources by renowned historians, d) the historian taught history at a prestige but small university, and e) the historian maintained personal historical blogs.
Answer:
B. mixed economy
Explanation:
#PLATOLIVESMATTER