The probability that any offspring will have a bent fifth finger is 100% . All of their children will inherit one dominant allele from the man (B) and one recessive allele from the woman (b), resulting in the heterozygous genotype (Bb), which exhibits the dominant trait of a bent fifth finger.
In a scenario where a man is homozygous dominant (BB) for a bent fifth finger trait, and a woman is homozygous recessive (bb) for the same trait, their offspring's probability of having a bent fifth finger can be determined.
Using a Punnett square, it's evident that all their offspring will inherit one dominant allele (B) from the man and one recessive allele (b) from the woman, resulting in a heterozygous genotype (Bb).
As the dominant allele (B) expresses the trait, the probability of any offspring having a bent fifth finger is 100% or 1, as all the children will exhibit this dominant trait.
Learn more on allele here brainly.com/question/20724296
#SPJ4
The probability of the offspring having a bent finger is 100% we can calculate this using a punnet square like one attached, where B is the dominant bent fifth finger and b is the recessive bent fifth finger, the man's genes are along the top and the woman's genes are along the side.
Malthus illustrated the essay on the principles of population and its growth. According to his theory, the population growth will consistently supervise to outrun the food supply.
Thomas Malthus was an English scholar and influential economist who worked in the field of economy and demography.
The theory of Malthus reveals the growth of the population with respect to the food supply. He believed that the balance between population growth and food supply can be maintained through preventative and flattering appraisal.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about Malthus, refer to the link;
#SPJ2
Answer:
The Malthusian Theory of Population: The concept that the human population exponentially grows and will eventually be too large to be supported by the food production rate, leading to mass starvation.
People who believe this are Malthusians.
Explanation:
This is more of an APHG question, but yeehaw
] interactions occur between individuals of the same species.
Answer:
Intraspecific interactions occur between individuals of the same species.
Explanation:
In population ecology, intraspecific interactions can be described as the type of interaction which occurs between the members of the same species. Intraspecific competition can be described as an interaction between organisms of the same species in which they compete for resources like food, water, shelter etc.
In contrast, interspecific interactions are they type of interactions which occur in different species. For example, a fox and a lion and fighting for the same prey.
Answer:
intraspecific
Explanation:
Intraspecific interactions can include competition which will occur between members of the same species.
They are all eukaryotes.
They have been classified based on what they are not.
They have too many shared characteristics.
The reason that protists are difficult to classify is they have been classified based on what they are not. The correct option is C.
Any member of the varied eukaryotic, primarily unicellular group of tiny organisms known as protists. They might exhibit some physical and physiological traits that are shared by both plants and animals.
The four phyla that make up the Protozoa are flagellates, ciliates, spore-forming protists, and protists that resemble amoebas.
Protists have eukaryotic cells, as opposed to bacteria. These organisms have cytoplasmic membrane-bound components as well as a nucleus that is membrane-bound. The broad class of organisms known as protozoa includes those that resemble fungi, animals, or plants.
Therefore, the correct option is C. They have been classified based on what they are not.
To learn more about protists, refer to the link:
#SPJ2
Answer:
They have been classified based on what they are not.
Explanation:
i just took the test
convergent boundary
divergent boundary
transform boundary