The correct answer is A.
The temperance movement was a social movement positioned against the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages. It highlighted the negative effect of alcohol on human health and family life. It sought for laws that prohibited alcohol extensively.
Their doctrines sucedeed somehow and led to enactment of the Eighteenth Amendment to the US Constitution and to the establishment of the Prohibition from 1920 to 1933.
The significance of the audience in the production of history is paramount, shaping the narrative's perspective and influencing the selection of information and themes.
The role of the audience in the production of history cannot be underestimated. Historians craft narratives with a keen awareness of their readership, recognizing that perspectives and biases shape the telling of historical events.
This awareness is twofold: historians consider the contemporary audience's interests and societal context, as well as anticipate the impact on future generations.
The intended audience influences the selection of information, emphasis on specific events, and portrayal of key figures.
For example, a history book aimed at academia might delve deeply into nuanced analyses, while a popular history aimed at a general audience may prioritize engaging storytelling and simplified explanations.
Furthermore, the cultural, political, and social inclinations of the audience impact the historian's interpretations and framing of events.
The power of the audience in shaping history underscores the dynamic nature of historical interpretation. Historians are not passive conveyors of facts but active participants in constructing a narrative that resonates with their audience while maintaining scholarly rigor.
Learn more about historical interpretation
#SPJ11
The significance of the audience in the production of history lies in its ability to shape the narrative and interpretation of historical events. Historians consider their audience when selecting and presenting information, taking into account their prior knowledge, interests, and biases. The audience's expectations and values also influence the way history is presented, as historians may emphasize certain aspects or perspectives to engage and resonate with their audience. By considering the audience, historians ensure that their work is accessible, relevant, and meaningful.
Significance of Audience in the Production of History:
In the production of history, the audience holds great importance as it influences the way historical events are presented and interpreted. Historians consider their audience when selecting and presenting information, as the intended audience influences the style, tone, and content of historical accounts.
The audience can vary and may include scholars, students, policymakers, or the general public. Historians must take into account the prior knowledge, interests, and biases of their audience to effectively communicate historical information.
Furthermore, the audience's expectations and values play a significant role in shaping historical narratives. Historians may emphasize certain aspects or perspectives to engage and resonate with their audience. This can involve highlighting the experiences of marginalized groups, exploring different interpretations of events, or focusing on themes that are relevant to the audience's concerns.
The significance of the audience lies in its ability to influence the interpretation and understanding of history. Historical narratives are constructed with the audience in mind, aiming to engage, educate, and challenge their perspectives. By considering the audience, historians can ensure that their work is accessible, relevant, and meaningful to those who engage with it.
Learn more about significance of audience in the production of history here:
#SPJ14
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover
B.
research scientist Julius Rosenberg
C.
Congressman Richard Nixon
D.
Senator Joseph McCarth
Answer:
D
Explanation:
question and demonstrates your ability to:
. Construct a thesis.
. Determine reliability of a source.
Corroborate evidence. (find 3 pieces of evidence from 3 different sources that say
the
same thing and prove your thesis correct)
· Acknowledge the counter argument.
Construct a well written historical argument
Answer:
Mexican migration to the United States rose sharply. The number of legal migrants grew from around 20,000 migrants per year during the 1910s to about 50,000–100,000 migrants per year during the 1920s.
Explanation:
Mexicans were generally not welcome in the United States in the 1920s due to discrimination and restrictions. However, there was unrestricted legal immigration from Mexico as a political compromise.
In the 1920s, Mexicans faced discrimination and were not generally welcome in the United States. Waves of violence aimed at Mexicans and Mexican Americans swept the Southwest, and they were denied the right to vote and barred from attending Anglo-American schools.
When evaluating the reliability of a source, consider factors such as the author's expertise, the source's bias, and its publication date. For instance, a firsthand account from a Mexican immigrant during the 1920s would be more reliable than a biased newspaper article. Use this evaluation process to select reliable sources for your argument.
However, it is eqaully important to note that there was unrestricted legal immigration from Mexico and other parts of the Western Hemisphere during this time, as a political compromise demanded by congressmen representing industry and agribusiness in the Southwest.
#SPJ2
The television debates between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy made the debate an important part of the campaign of the president.
Explanation:
The television debates between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy drastically changed the landscape of American politics almost overnight.
These debates were the first time that the Americans could simply hear the two main candidates go head to head accordingly on the laws that he want to implement, their policies and their vision with the both parties willing to prove they are the better one.
This contest of rhetoric was better than simple speeches as these gave the two sides of the narrative at the same time.
It was Kennedy who won because he was more resonant with the people and he also won the debates from Nixon