Financial planning and budgeting are not the same. Financial planning involves setting goals and creating a plan, while budgeting is a specific part of financial planning that focuses on managing income and expenses.
No, financial planning and budgeting do not mean the same thing.
Financial planning refers to the process of setting goals, analyzing financial resources, and creating a plan to achieve those goals.
It involves considering factors such as income, expenses, investments, and savings to make informed decisions.
On the other hand, budgeting is a specific part of financial planning.
It focuses on creating a detailed plan for managing and allocatingincome and expenses. Budgeting helps individuals or organizations track their spending, manage debt, and save for specific goals.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Explanation:
The adjusting entry is shown below:
Deferred Subscription Revenue A/c Dr $12,000
To Subscription revenue A/c $12,000
(Being the deferred subscription amount is adjusted)
The computation is shown below:
= Number of subscriptions sold × sale price each × (number of months ÷ total number of months in a year)
= 400 subscriptions × $90 × (4 months ÷ 12 months)
= $36,000 × (4 months ÷ 12 months)
= $12,000
The four months are reported from the September 1 to December 31
Answer:
The correct answer is: A) True.
Explanation:
Strategic commercial policy is defined as that commercial policy that a government implements through intervention and regulation and that is intended to modify the strategic interaction that occurs in certain sectors between national and foreign companies in the international arena. These actions, which are usually implemented through industrial policy, try
favor national companies over their foreign rivals. Those who support these practices argue that, given the imperfections of the markets, there are good reasons that justify an active industrial policy.
The strategic trade policy argument consists of two explanations: first, it states that with appropriate actions; A government increases national income if it somehow ensures that the companies that appropriate the advantages of acting first are national and not foreign.
Secondly; it is convenient for a government to intervene in an industry if it helps national companies to overcome the entry barriers created by foreign companies; who have already reaped the advantages of the one who acts first.
In conclusion, if these arguments are correct, the government has many reasons to intervene in international trade.
2. Indecisive
3. Expert
4. Quiet
5. Aggressive
true or false for the best control of both the accelerator and brake pedals rest the heel of your foot on the floor??