Answer:
c. Pan-Africanism
Explanation:
i just took the test so i really hope this helps you
Answer:
c
Explanation:
finances used to pay for new inventions
laws that protected new inventions
profits made from new inventions
Answer:
profits made from new inventions
Explanation:
technology refferd to profits made from new inventions
Hypotheses are initial educated guesses that can be tested through experiments, while theories are comprehensive explanations for observed phenomena, supported by abundant empirical evidence.
Hypotheses and theories are both significant terms used in the scientific method, but they serve different roles. Hypotheses are initial educated guesses or predictions about a particular situation, which are testable and falsifiable. Hypotheses generally arise from observations and are consequently used to conduct an experiment.
On the other hand, Theories are more comprehensive, detailed and broad explanations of observed phenomena, substantiated by a significant amount of empirical evidence gathered through multiple experiments and observations. Theories are not simply educated guesses but are well-supported explanations that can make accurate predictions about the natural world.
#SPJ6
B. Executive privilege
C. The supreme court's ability to strike down laws
D. Presidential appointment to the bench
The term judicial review refers to the Supreme Court‘s ability to strike down laws.
Further Explanation:
Judicial Review is a process in which all the legislativeorexecutive actions of the government are subjected to review by the judiciary. The court can invalidate any law act or action on the basis that it is in the violation to the Constitution. It is one of the tool of “checks and balances”and ensure “separation of power”. The scope of judicial review varies from one country to another. Judiciary can review any cases either it is civil or criminal cases. U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Marbury versus Madison case, in which judiciary got power of judicial review. US judiciary works on the principle of “due process oflaw”.United States have district courts which have procedures for appealing in higher courts. The court declare the Constitutionality of any law .It is the method of judicial interpretation. Australia too have followed US system of judiciary. It is a concept judicial independency.
Learn more:
1. What is one major difference between state and federal courts in the united states? brainly.com/question/1823464
2. When trying officials who have been impeached by the house of representatives? brainly.com/question/2881486
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: Political Science
Source: U.S. Constitution
Keywords: Legislative, executive actions, review, invalidate, checks and balances, separation of power, civil or criminal cases, due process of law, constitutionality. Judicial independency.
Judicial review is the authority granted to the U.S. Supreme Court to scrutinize and potentially invalidate laws if they are found to be unconstitutional.
The term judicial review specifically refers to the ability attributed to supreme courts to review, interpret, and invalidate legislation if they are deemed unconstitutional. In this context, option C is the right choice. In the U.S., this system allows the Supreme Court to assess the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislative branch and, if necessary, to strike them down. The keyword here is review which signifies that a court, in this case, the supreme court, has the authority to scrutinize and overrule laws that are incompatible with the constitution.
#SPJ6