Answer:
Member nations placed armed forces at the disposal of the organization
Explanation:
I took the test :)
b. fair state representation in the national Congress
c. the new role for a limited monarchy for foreign affairs
d. the range of power handed to the national government e. the ability of the judicial branch to validate new laws
Answer:
d. the range of power handed to the national government.
Explanation:
The main issue that divided the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists was the ratification of the Constitution. This was due to a deep disagreement when it came to the role of the national government, and the question of how much power this should have. On the one hand, the Federalists believed that the federal government should have significant power, and should be able to maintain the stability of the Union. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists worried that such power might lead to despotism, and instead wanted most power to be handed to the states.
The main point of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the scope of authority granted to the federal government, namely the judicial branch's capacity to uphold new laws. Option (D) is right as a result.
José Gervasio Artigas was the only Federalist leader in the Platine Region. He resisted the centralist governments that emerged in Buenos Aires after the May Revolution and established the Federal League in its place in 1814 with the cooperation of numerous Argentine Provinces and the Banda Oriental (modern-day Uruguay).
The United Provinces of South America's centralist Constitution was rejected by the Federal armies in 1819, and they went on to defeat Supreme Director José Rondeau's forces
at the 1820 Battle of Cepeda, ending the central government and securing provincial sovereignty through a series of inter-provincial treaties (such as the Treaties of Pilar, Benegas, and the Quadrilateral Treaty)
Learn more about Federalists, from :
#SPJ5
B.False
In 1954, in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that the constitution guarantees equal protection of the law and that segregated schools could never be equal is a true statement.
This case was ruled on May 17, 195. Here the Court was said to have ruled that racial segregation in public schools is one that is against the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and they did overturn the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision that goes to say "separate but equal."
The Board of Education of Topeka case is one where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools hinders the Fourteenth Amendment.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education from
In 1954, in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that the constitution guarantees equal protection of the law and that segregated schools could never be equal... It is true.
6
16
-6
-16
Answer:
16
Explanation:
Answer:
to teach their religion to the American Indians
Explanation:
Carter aided the Mujahideen in fighting the Soviets.
Carter opposed a boycott of Iranian goods
Carter increased trade with the Iranians.
What is true of Carter’s intention to free the hostages in Iran was that sought help from the United Nations.
As an international body, it is created to make positive contributions in maintaining international peace and security among the world nations.
Hence, it is true he sought help from the United Nations to help to free the hostages in Iran.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about United Nations
#SPJ2