The height and length of the box to the nearest tenth will be 10.6 inch and 7.4 inch respectively.
Explanation
Suppose, the height of the box is inch
As the length of the box is 3.2 in. less than the height, so the length will be:
Given that, the width of the box is 2.3 inch. and the volume is 180.4 inch³
Formula for Volume of a box:
So, the equation will be....
Now using quadratic formula......
(Negative value of is ignored as the height can't be negative)
So, the height to the nearest tenth will be 10.6 inch and the length will be:
Answer:
-14a^2b-42ab^2+56abc
Step-by-step explanation:
You can use the FOIL method
multiply the first numbers
then inner
then outer
then last
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
X₁: Life span of a battery of Brand X
X₁~N(μ₁;σ₁²)
μ₁= 102hours
σ₁= 6.8hours
X₂: Life span of a battery of Brand Y
X₂~N(μ₂;σ²)
μ₂= 100hours
σ₂= 1.4hours
To complete the first two sentences, you have to use the empirical rule:
μ±δ= 68% of the distribution
μ±2δ= 95% of the distribution
μ±3δ= 99% of the distribution
1. About 68% of brand x’s batteries have a lifespan between 95.2 and 108.8 hours.
μ₁±σ₁= 102 ± 6.8= 95.2; 108.8
2. About 68% of brand y’s batteries have a lifespan between 98.6 and 101.4 hours.
μ₂±σ₂= 100 ± 1.4= 98.6; 101.4
3. The life span of brand Y ’s battery is more likely to be consistently close to the mean.
The standard deviations show you the dispersion of the distribution. A low standard deviation indicates that the values are close to the mean. A high standard deviation indicates that the values are further away the values are from the mean.
The standard deviation for the X batteries is σ₁= 6.8hours and the Y batteries are σ₂= 1.4hours since the standard deviation for the Y batteries is less than the standard deviation for the X batteries, you'd expect that the life span of the Y batteries will be closer to the mean than the life span of the X batteries.
I hope it helps!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the pair of numbers - |-11| and - (-11), we want to determine which is greater or whether they are equal
First lets rewrite both numbers.
- |-11| = -11 (note that the modulus sign will change any negative value into a positive value and that's why |-11| is equivalent to 11)
- (-11) = 11 (note that the negative sign here was retained since it is not an absolute value like the former)
It can be seen that both numbers are therefore not equal i.e - |-11| is less than - (-11). Hence the expression - |-11| < - (-11) is a true statement
Answer:
Option A The linear model on tar content accounts for 92.4% of the variability in nicotine content.
Step-by-step explanation:
R-square also known as coefficient of determination measures the variability in dependent variable explained by the linear relationship with independent variable.
The given scenario demonstrates that nicotine content is a dependent variable while tar content is an independent variable. So, the given R-square value 92.4% describes that 92.4% of variability in nicotine content is explained by the linear relationship with tar content. We can also write this as "The linear model on tar content accounts for 92.4% of the variability in nicotine content".
The Upper R squared or the coefficient of determination here represents the percentage of the variability in the nicotine content that can be explained by the tar content in the regression model, which in this case is 92.4%.
In this context, the meaning of Upper R squared is represented by option A. The linear model on tar content accounts for 92.4% of the variability in nicotine content. This indicates that 92.4% of the change in nicotine content can be explained by the amount of tar content based on the linear regression model used. This measure is also known as the coefficient of determination. Meanwhile, options B, C, and D are not correct interpretations of the R squared in this context. Both B and D wrongly relate the percentage to the predictability of the data points and option C incorrectly associates this percentage with the residual magnitude.
#SPJ3
Answer:
C 288
Step-by-step explanation:
using counter clockwise rotation
360/5 x 4 =288