Answer:
sacred
Explanation:
the definition that I found is
"a short piece of sacred choral music, typically polyphonic and unaccompanied."
The main goal of labor unions by the end of the 19th century was higher wages and better working conditions. Thus, option (C) is correct.
Labor Union, refers to the association of the workers formed in the organized to undertake the welfare activities for the labor and workers at the workplace. They were formed as the result of the exploitation being carried down by the Businessmen.
In simple, way, The labor union as formed to protect the rights and interest of the workers.
Labor union number increased by the 19th century as the number of the jobs increased in America by the advent of the industrial revolution.
Organized labor organizations campaigned for greater pay, more flexible hours, and safer working conditions for people in the industrial sector.
The labor movement spearheaded initiatives to end child labor, offer health benefits, and aid injured or retired workers.
Therefore, it can be concluded that option (C) is correct.
Learn more about Labor union here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Civil liberties are any guaranteed freedoms or rights, such as Freedom of Speech, the right to privacy, and the right to marry.
Civil right is the right not to be treated unfairly for such aspects as gender, race, disability, etc. This also included the right to exercise their own religion.
Explanation:
Answer:
I did the test and "D seagoing trade and urbanization" is NOT correct. But i don't know the answer
Explanation:
states must provide lawyers to poor criminal defendants
a suspect cannot have an attorney present during police questioning
police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning
The answer is: that evidence seized illegally cannot be used in a criminal trial.
The Miranda rights ( also known as Miranda warning ) is an oral notification given to a person in police custody. That person is usually accused of committing a crime or criminal offence.
The accused is given the right to remain silent, meaning they can refuse to answer any questions or give information to law enforcement officials. They also have the right to have an attorney present during their interrogation. If they can not afford one, the court will appoint an attorney for them.
The Miranda warning is only given if the individual in question is about to be interrogated, and not if arrested only.
This warning was established as part of the Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. Any evidence obtained from an accused person without them being given the Miranda rights can not be used as evidence in court.
Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966. It ruled that statements made by the defendant in an interrogation would only be admissible at trial if the individual was aware of his rights ( silence, attorney ), and that the individual understood the rights and voluntarily agreed to them.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that police must inform suspects of their rights before questioning.
Further Explanations:
Ruling of the Miranda versus Arizona stated that the detained suspect must be informed about their constitutional rights before they are being questioned or arrested. As per the ruling,the 5th Amendment act prevents prosecutors from using suspect’sstatement made at the time of interrogation or in custody. It is their legal right to refer an attorney afore being questioned.
Miranda's case was regarded as a radical change in the American Criminal law as it changed the extended the significance of the Fifth Amendment. As earlier, it was expected that the act protects the citizens against compulsion to confess and contempt of court but after the ruling, it also added that the act informs citizens about their rights. The ruling led to a significant impact of the America’s Law enforcement that also became the routine procedure of police. This procedure was also called Miranda warning that was the oral notifications give to the arrested person in the custody.
Learn more
1. The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards. Create clear Miranda to be applied Georgia before imposing the death penalty?brainly.com/question/637963
2. What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as vice president on February 17, 1801, by the House of Representatives after thirty-six ballots? brainly.com/question/8775340
3. How did henry ford’s model t contribute to the culture of the roaring twenties? brainly.com/question/7802830
Answer Details
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Miranda versus Arizona
Keywords: Miranda versus Arizona,Miranda versus Arizona, the 5th Amendment, suspect’s statement, interrogation, custody, legal right, American Criminal law, Fifth Amendment, Law enforcement, Miranda warning,custody
B. Vietnam made the reforms even more popular.
C. Vietnam cost so much that there was less money for the War on Poverty.
D. Vietnam cost so little that more money was available for the War on Poverty.
The correct answer is C) Vietnam War cost so much that there was less money for the War on Poverty.
Vietnam War affected Johnson's War on Poverty in that the Vietnam War cost so much that there was less money for the War on Poverty.
American people were very disappointed with the President's Johnson approach to the Vietnam War. In the particular case of the War on Poverty, the Vietnam War affected Johnson's War on Poverty in that the Vietnam War cost so much that there was less money for the War on Poverty. This did not like in America and the protest and marches in the street against the war started. President Johnson had to reconsider with U.S. early defeats in Vietnam, admitting that the war had been a mistake and retiring the troops.