Answer:
It gives courts the authority to hold trials and determine the facts of cases.
Treaty of Paris marked the end of the Spanish-American War.
Further Explanation:
The Spanish-American war was an armed battle between Spain and the United States during the year 1898. The main cause for this war was related to Cuban Independence. Revolutions were taking place from many years by Cubans against Spanish rule and after some time these revolts received the aid of the United States and it resulted in Spanish-American War. The war lasted for around ten weeks and was battled in the Caribbean and Pacific.
Everyone knew that if the US navy go into the war, it would prove to be crucial with respect to the initial result of the war. After the interference of the Naval forces in the battle, Madrid ordered for his modern fleet back to guard Spanish borders after the attack on two Spanish Naval ships by the US Navy.
The Treaty of Paris was the solution to any clauses were favoring the United States as they got control of Cuba temporarily and also got full authorities of Puerto Ricoand Guam along with Philippine Island. This setback was considered a big beating for Spain as the citizens of Spain started a revolution against the government which was also known as Generation of 98.
Learn More
1. how did alexander hamilton and James madison view the constitution?brainly.com/question/1320793
2. In their tv and radio advertisements, many car companies of the 1950s promoted?brainly.com/question/4987782
3. Many enlightenment ideas were incorporated into?brainly.com/question/784979
Answer Details
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Spanish-American War
Keywords: United States, Spain, Spanish-American War, Navy, Puerto Rico, Guam, Philippine Island, US Marine, Cuba, Treaty of Paris,Philippine Island,Generation of 98
Answer:
Akbar was a Mughal emperor. Jodha was his wife. Their son was Jahangir.
Answer:
Jodha is akbar's wife and jhangir is his son
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It got amended for 3 times time since it became the legal document.
Hope it helps!
Internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Japanese Americans returned to their homes.
Executive Order 9022 was overturned.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was that internment camps were affirmed as legal.
Korematsu v. United States was one of the key cases of the Supreme Court of the United States, where compliance with the Executive Order 9066 was considered, according to which Japanese-Americans were obliged to relocate to internment camps during the Second World War, regardless of their citizenship.
By a decision of 6 judges against 3, the Supreme Court agreed with the government, declaring that the order complies with the Constitution. The decision made by Judge Hugo Black ruled that the need for protection against espionage outweighed the individual rights of Fred Korematsu, as well as the rights of other Americans of Japanese origin.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was the affirmation of the constitutionality of Japanese American internment during World War II, setting a controversial precedent for potential civil rights violations during times of national security.
The effect of Korematsu v. United States was:
1. Japanese Americans were not allowed to return to their homes immediately after the ruling. The internment camps were not immediately disbanded.
2. The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, validating the government's actions based on military necessity.
3. Discrimination and racial profiling against Japanese Americans continued, despite the ruling.
4. The decision set a precedent that allowed the government to potentially justify the violation of civil rights during times of national security or military conflict.
5. The ruling remained controversial and was widely criticized for its infringement on civil liberties, eventually leading to calls for its reconsideration and efforts to overturn it. However, the specific Executive Order 9022 was not directly affected by the ruling.
Learn more on Korematsu v. United States here;
#SPJ6