A student weighed out a 2.055 g sample of a cobalt chloride hydrate, ConClmpH2O, where n, m, and p are integer values to be determined. The student heated the sample to drive off the waters of hydration, reweighed the anhydride sample and found 1.121 g anhydrate

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The given mass of cobalt chloride hydrate = 2.055 g

A sample of cobalt chloride hydrate was heated to drive off waters of hydration and the anhydrate was weighed.

The mass of anhydrous cobalt chloride = 1.121 g anhydrate.

The mass of water lost during heating = 2.055 g - 1.121 g = 0.934 g

Converting mass of water of hydration present in the hydrate to moles using molar mass:

Mass of water = 0.934 g

Molar mass of water = 18.0 g/mol

Moles of water = 0.934 g * (1 molH_(2)O )/(18 g H_(2)O ) =0.0519 mol H_(2)O


Related Questions

Which best describes the difference between a physical change and a chemical change? A. A chemical change does not result in a new substance being formed, whereas a physical change does.    B. A physical change is a change from one state of matter to another; a chemical change results in a new substance formed.   C. A physical change produces a new element, and a chemical change results in a bond breaking between atoms.   D. A chemical change results in a new element being formed, and a physical change results in a new compound being formed.
Write a balanced net ionic equation for the following reaction
The table shows the food choices for two species of birds. Bird Food Questor small seeds, flying insects Wood Plaxar large berries, beetles Which will most likely happen to the Questors as a result of the Wood Plaxers migrating to their habitat? A. the Questors will be forced to fly to a different habitat B. the Questors will compete with the Wood Plaxars for food resources C. the two species will coexist with no competition D. the two species will be come extinct
Why is anthracite a better fuel than lignite?
What hypotheses could you propose about the relationship between the position of a type of atom in a molecule and the number of bonds that the atom forms?

Which statement best relates an empirical formula with a molecular formula? They are always different for the same compound. Subscripts of empirical formulas can be reduced. Molecular formulas can be determined from empirical formulas. They both show the actual ratio of elements for a compound.

Answers

ANSWER

empirical formula is the simplest ratio of whole numbers of components making up a compound

molecular formula is the actual composition of components making up a compound

to analyse each statement

A.They are always different for the same compound. -

the empirical formula in some instances can be the same as the molecular formula. therefore this statement is incorrect.

B. Subscripts of empirical formulas can be reduced

empirical formula gives the simplest ratios and the subscripts cannnot be further simplified therefore this is incorrect

C. Molecular formulas can be determined from empirical formulas

using the empirical formula, the molecular formula can be determined. therefore its correct.

D. They both show the actual ratio of elements for a compound

only the molecular formula gives the actual ratio of elements whereas the empirical formula gives the simplest ratio of elements. this statement is incorrect

The correct statement is C.

Answer:

Molecular formulas can be determined from empirical formulas.

Explanation:

How do I solve this?? ok having a hard time BRAINLIST​

Answers

Answer:

1) 6(1/2)

2) 8(4/5)

Explanation:

1) 7 - 1/2 = 7/1 - 1/2 = 14/2 - 1/2 = 13/2 = 6(1/2)

2) 11(2/5) - 2(3/5) = 57/5 - 13/5 = 44/5 = 8(4/5)

During unfavorable conditions and amoeba forms a

Answers

A cyst forms when its in unfavorable conditions
A cryst forms

Hope The Answer Helps! >.<

You want to prepare a solution with a concentration of 200.0μM from a stock solution with a concentration of 500.0mM. At your disposal, you have 5-mL and 10-mL transfer pipets and volumetric flasks of sizes 100, 250, 500, and 1000mL. Which of the following serial dilutions will give you the 200.0μM solution?

Answers

Answer:

1) The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

2) The dilution scheme will not result in a 200μM solution.

3) The dilution scheme will not result in a 200μM solution.

4) The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

5) The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

Explanation:

Convert the given original molarity to molar as follows.

500mM = 500mM * ((1M)/(1000M))= 0.5M

Consider the following serial dilutions.

1)

Dilute 5.00 mL of the stock solution upto 500 mL . Then dilute 10.00 mL of the resulting solution upto 250.0 mL.

Molarity of 500 mL solution:

M_(2)= (M_(1)V_(1))/(V_(2))= ((0.5M)(5.00mL))/(500 mL)= 5 * 10^(-3)M

10 mL of this solution is diluted to 250 ml

M_(final)= (M_(2)V_(2))/(V_(final))= ((5 * 10^(-3)M)(10.0mL))/(250 mL)= 2 * 10^(-4)M

Convert μM :

2 * 10^(-4)M = (2 * 10^(-4)M)((1 \mu M)/(10^(-6)M))= 200 \mu M

Therefore, The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

2)

Dilute 5.00 mL of the stock solution upto 100 mL . Then dilute 10.00 mL of the resulting solution upto 1000 mL.

Molarity of 100 mL solution:

M_(2)= (M_(1)V_(1))/(V_(2))= ((0.5M)(5.00mL))/(100 mL)= 2.5 * 10^(-2)M

10 mL of this solution is diluted to 1000 ml

M_(final)= (M_(2)V_(2))/(V_(final))= ((2.5 * 10^(-2)M)(10.0mL))/(1000 mL)= 2.5 * 10^(-4)M

Convert μM :

2.5 * 10^(-4)M = (2.5 * 10^(-4)M)((1 \mu M)/(10^(-6)M))= 250 \mu M

Therefore, The dilution scheme will not result in a 200μM solution.

3)

Dilute 10.00 mL of the stock solution upto 100 mL . Then dilute 5 mL of the resulting solution upto 100 mL.

Molarity of 100 mL solution:

M_(2)= (M_(1)V_(1))/(V_(2))= ((0.5M)(10mL))/(100 mL)= 0.05M

5 mL of this solution is diluted to 1000 ml

M_(final)= (M_(2)V_(2))/(V_(final))= ((0.05M)(5mL))/(1000 mL)= 0.25 * 10^(-4)M

Convert μM :

0.25 * 10^(-4)M = (0.25 * 10^(-4)M)((1 \mu M)/(10^(-6)M))= 25 \mu M

Therefore, The dilution scheme will not result in a 200μM solution.

4)

Dilute 5 mL of the stock solution upto 250 mL . Then dilute 10 mL of the resulting solution upto 500 mL.

Molarity of 250 mL solution:

M_(2)= (M_(1)V_(1))/(V_(2))= ((0.5M)(5mL))/(250 mL)= 0.01M

10 mL of this solution is diluted to 500 ml

M_(final)= (M_(2)V_(2))/(V_(final))= ((0.01M)(10mL))/(500 mL)= 2 * 10^(-4)M

Convert μM :

2 * 10^(-4)M = (2 * 10^(-4)M)((1 \mu M)/(10^(-6)M))= 200 \mu M

Therefore, The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

5)

Dilute 10  mL of the stock solution upto 250 mL . Then dilute 10 mL of the resulting solution upto 1000 mL.

Molarity of 250 mL solution:

M_(2)= (M_(1)V_(1))/(V_(2))= ((0.5M)(10mL))/(250 mL)= 0.02M

10 mL of this solution is diluted to 1000 ml

M_(final)= (M_(2)V_(2))/(V_(final))= ((0.02M)(10mL))/(1000 mL)= 2 * 10^(-4)M

Convert μM :

2 * 10^(-4)M = (2 * 10^(-4)M)((1 \mu M)/(10^(-6)M))= 200 \mu M

Therefore, The dilution scheme will result in a 200μM solution.

Are earthquakes scattered all over the world or do they seem to occur near each other (in groups)?

Answers

well really earthquakes come anywhere but it takes it time like it starts when the weather changes you know

Why don't the oceans simply reabsorb the water that evaporates?

Answers

The water evaporates into the clouds

because the oceans already have a ton of water in them so they don't really need to absorb the water again that evaporates