As Starbuck expands in Chile, the company wants store décor and paper goods used to be controlled by Starbucks corporation. The Starbucks corporation, which is a roaster, marketer and retailer of coffee, licenses its trademarks through licensed stores, and grocery and foodservice accounts.
Answer:
$1,023
Explanation:
The computation of the selling price of Job 806 is given below:-
Total cost of JOB 806 = $682
Selling price of the cost = 100 + 50
= 150%
Selling price = Total cost of JOB 806 × Selling price of the cost Percentage
= $682 × 150%
= $1,023
Therefore for computing the selling price we simply multiply the total cost of JOB 806 with selling price of the cost percentage.
Answer:
You must post the whole paragraph?????
Answer:
The answer is C. Some firms exiting the market
Explanation:
When there is a sudden fall in the market demand in a competitive industry(e.g perfect competition) some firms would making economic losses and it is best if they shut down operation and production. Once these happen, they exit the market.
Option A is incorrect . Same as option B.
Option D is also incorrect
A sudden fall in market demand in a competitive industry can lead to a short-run market equilibrium price lower than the original equilibrium, some firms exiting the market, and a market equilibrium price higher than the short-run price.
In a competitive industry, a sudden fall in market demand can have several effects. The correct answer is (d) All of the above. When market demand falls, it creates excess supply in the market, leading to a decrease in the market equilibrium price. This means that option (a) is correct. The lower price in the short run may cause some firms to exit the market due to lower profitability, which confirms option (c). Lastly, in the long run, if demand remains low, the market equilibrium price may eventually be higher than the short-run price as the supply adjusts to the lower demand, validating option (b).
#SPJ3
Answer:
I would issue stock because it is cheaper than borrowing.
Explanation:
First of all, issuing stock does not represent the obligation to pay interest over a long period of time, which can become very expensive if market conditions become adverse. Besides, if the company is small, it probably does not have the most advantageous financial conditions according to the banks, and the interest rate could be relatively high.
Besides, borrowing would mean increasing the liabilities in the financial statements, which could make the company less attractive for future investors.
Issuing stock does have the disadvantage of dilluting control of the company, because now stockholders own a piece of the company and could demand changes in management, and a different company strategy.
B)Using exponential smoothing with ? = 0.20, if the exponential forecast for week 3 was estimated as the average of the first two weeks [(315 + 415)/2 = 365], what would you forecast week 5 to be? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.)
Week 1 315
Week 2 415
Week 3 615
Week 4 715
Answer: A. 582 ; B. 475
Explanation:
A. Three week moving average
three moving average requires us to take the last three weeks forecast in calculating the forecast for following week, to calculate week 5 forecast we will start from week 2 to week 4.
Week 2 = 415
Week 3 = 615
Week 4 = 715
Three week moving average = (WEEK 2 + Week 3 + Week 4)/N
Three week moving average = (415 + 615 + 715)/3
Three week moving average = 1745/3 = 581.6667 = 582
using three week moving average the forecast for week 5 is 582
B.Exponential smoothing
Exponential smoothing forecast for week 3 is 365, to calculate the forecast of week 5 we need to find a forecast for week 4 first using exponential smoothing
S = smoothing Factor = 0.2
D = most recent forecast (week 3) = 615
F = most recent forecast under exponential smoothing = 365
Forecast(week 4) = (D × S) + (F × (1 - S))
Forecast(week 4) = (615 × 0.20) + (365 × (1 - 0.20))
Forecast(week 4) = 123 + 292 = 415
The forecast for week 4 using exponential smoothing is 415
Week 5 forecast calculation
S = smoothing Factor = 0.2
D = most recent forecast (week 4) = 715
F = most recent forecast under exponential smoothing = 415
Forecast(week 5) = (D × S) + (F × (1 - S))
Forecast(week 5) = (715 × 0.20) + (415 - (1 - 0.20))
Forecast(week 5) = 143 + 332= 475
forecast for week 5 is 475
The forecast for the next week using a three-week moving average would be 448 items. Using exponential smoothing with a smoothing constant of 0.20, the forecast for week 5 would be 435 items.
To answer both parts of your question:
A) The three-week moving average is calculated by taking the average of the past 3 weeks, so for week 4, it would be the average of weeks 1, 2, and 3: [(315 + 415 + 615)/3 = 448]. Therefore, the forecast for week 4 using a three-week moving average would be 448 items, rounded to the nearest whole number.
B)Exponential smoothing requires the use of a smoothing constant, in this case, ? = 0.20, and the previous actual and forecasted values. Using the given exponential forecast for week 3 of 365, the forecasted demand for week 5 would be calculated as follows: Forecast = ? * Actual_previous + (1-?) * Forecast_previous = 0.20 * 715 + (1-0.20) * 365 = 435. Therefore, your week 5 forecast would be 435 items, rounded to the nearest whole number.
#SPJ3
Answer:
c. 7215
Explanation:
Number of shares of Stock C = 275
Value of Stock C = $52
Number of shares of Stock D = 240
Value of Stock D = $23
The weight of stock of a given stock is defined by the total value of the stock divided by the total value of the portfolio. For stock C:
The weight of of Stock C is 0.7215 or 72.15%.