Demand always decreases from period to period
Demand fluctuates from period to period in a regular pattern
Demand is constant, as in the mature stage of the product life cycle
None of the above
Answer:
The answer is Demand fluctuates from period to period in a regular pattern
Explanation:
when demand is seasonal, it means the products are purchased during certain months of the year. Seasonal demand can also be defined as a certain time series with repetitive or predictable patterns of demand
In the MARS Marketing Management Simulation, a 'highly seasonal' demand refers to demand fluctuating regularly with the season or time of the year. Businesses have to strategically manage this fluctuation.
In the MARS Marketing Management Simulation, when it is mentioned that demand is highly seasonal, it signifies that demand fluctuates from period to period in a regular pattern. This essentially means that demand is not constant but changes based on the time of the year or season.
For example, the demand for winter clothes increases during the cold seasons and decreases during the warmer seasons. Thus, in relation to the MARS simulation, businesses must strategically plan and adapt their marketing, production, and inventory management strategies to cater to these foreseeable shifts in demand.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Identify with Your Goals, Build a Professional Resume, Become Aware of Your Strengths, Assume Full Responsibility for Your Life, Always Raise Your Standards, Brand Yourself, and Network
Explanation:
Answer:
B) erosion of soil
Explanation:
b. Management by Objectives
c. Incident Action Planning
d. Integrated Communications
e. Unified ,nd
f. Accountability
Answer:
The correct answers are a. Common Terminology; d. Integrated Communications
Explanation:
Common terminology is a writing style for writing documents that are easy to understand. The language used is concise, direct and does not omit any details. All of the above creates a simpler reading experience, which makes its content understood at the first reading.
For its part, integrated communications applied to marketing, as the name implies, coordinate and integrate all the tools, ways and sources of marketing communication of an organization. This integration, which includes activities such as advertising, public relations, CRM, event management, etc. It is developed within the framework of a coherent program that aims to efficiently maximize the impact on customers and other stakeholders.
As the Operations Section Chief at the Incident Command Post, by asking for all communications to be done on a set of frequencies and in plain language, you are supporting the NIMS Management Characteristics of 'Common Terminology', 'Integrated Communications', and 'Accountability'.
In the scenario presented, where you as the Operations Section Chief at the Incident Command Post request all response communications to be conducted using a specific set of frequencies and require everyone in the field to use plain language, you are supporting several National Incident Management System (NIMS) Management Characteristics.
The characteristics being supported are 'Common Terminology', as you are emphasizing on the use of plain language; 'Integrated Communications', as you are insisting on using pre-determined frequencies for all communications; and 'Accountability', as adherence to set guidelines and standards determine individuals' responsibilities.
#SPJ6
A. utility cannot be measured objectively.
B. utility can be measured objectively because people can use prices of different goods to measure utility.
C. all of the important conclusions of the economic model of consumer behavior depend on utility being measured objectively.
D. the util truly is an objective, rather than a subjective, measure of utility.
Economists currently believe that utility, historically represented by 'util', is subjective and cannot be measured objectively. It varies based on individual preferences and circumstances. Prices can suggest perceived utility, but they cannot accurately measure it.
The term "util" was indeed used in historical context to represent a unit of utility. However, today, most economists agree with option A, that utility cannot be measured objectively. Utility is considered subjective as it varies from individual to individual based on their personal preferences, needs, and circumstances. It's challenging to quantitatively asses and compare utility across different individuals or even for the same individual across different circumstances. Prices of goods can be suggestive of their perceived utility but cannot accurately measure it as utility depends on personal subjective valuation.
#SPJ12
3. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract existsone party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract). Medtronic is suing for wrongful interference with a _______.
4. Who are the parties to the initial contract?5. _____is the third party who knew about the contract.
6. St. Jude learned about the contract and noncompete clause between Hughes and Medtronic from _____.
7. It is _____that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to breach his contract with Medtronic.
8. St. Jude ______before he left Medtronic.
9. What did St. Jude represent regarding the noncompete clause? That it ____enforceable.
10. Was the noncompete clause enforceable? 11. Did it matter if the clause was unenforceable? 12. Based on these facts, does it appear that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to break his contract with Medtronic?
13. Is Hughes liable for intentional interference with a contract?
15. Hughes is _______to be held liable for breach of contract.
16. If St. Jude had informed Hughes that the noncompete clause was enforceable and Hughes still left to come to work for them, would St. Jude be liable for intentional interference with a contract?
Answer:
YES
Because by definition, wrongful interference occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm
Explanation:
Did wrongful interference occur and if so, which type of wrongful interference occurred?
YES
Because by definition, wrongful interference occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm
1. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract exists one party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract.
2. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract exists one party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract.
3. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract existsone party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract).
Medtronic is suing for wrongful interference with a contractual business relationship.
4. Who are the parties to the initial contract? Medtronic and James Hughes
5. St. Jude Medical, S.C., Inc is the third party who knew about the contract.
6. St. Jude learned about the contract and noncompete clause between Hughes and Medtronic from James Hughes.
7. It is true that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to breach his contract with Medtronic.
8. St. Jude offered James Hughes a job as a sales director at a significant higher salary before he left Medtronic.
9. What did St. Jude represent regarding the non compete clause? That it was not enforceable.
10. Was the noncompete clause enforceable? YES
11. Did it matter if the clause was unenforceable? YES
12. Based on these facts, does it appear that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to break his contract with Medtronic? YES
13. Is Hughes liable for intentional interference with a contract? NO
15. Hughes is NOT to be held liable for breach of contract.
16. If St. Jude had informed Hughes that the noncompete clause was enforceable and Hughes still left to come to work for them, would St. Jude be liable for intentional interference with a contract? NO