Directions: Write a well-organized essay that includes an introduction, several paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Use evidence from at least four documents in your essay. Support your response with relevant facts,
examples, and details. Include additional outside information.
Historical Context:
In the early years of the republic, various controversial issues divided the American
people. Three such issues were ratification of the Constitution, purchase of the
Louisiana Territory, and expansion of slavery into the territories.
Task: Using the information from the documents and your knowledge of United States
history, write an essay in which you
Choose two issues mentioned in the historical context and for each
• Describe the historical circumstances surrounding the issue
• Discuss arguments of those in favor of and of those opposed to the issue.
In your discussion, include at least one argument on each side of the issue.
Guidelines:
In your essay, be sure to
• Develop all aspects of the task
• Incorporate information from at least four documents
• Incorporate relevant outside information
• Support the theme with relevant facts, examples, and details
• Use a logical and clear plan of organization, including an introduction and a conclusion that
are beyond a restatement of the theme
The essay question requires you to select two controversial issues from the early years of the US Republic and analytically discuss them, providing historical context, presenting arguments from both sides, and backing up your points with facts and examples from at least four documents.
This essay question is focusing on the early years of the American Republic's history, specifically in the controversial issues that divided the nation. You are expected to choose two topics: the Constitution's ratification, the Louisiana Territory's purchase, and the expansion of slavery into the territories. For each chosen issue, first, you must describe the historical circumstances surrounding that issue.
For example, the ratification of the constitution was a contentious moment in American history. Federalists, who were in favor, believed it would strengthen the national government; Anti-federalists, opposed, feared it would compromise states’ rights. The Louisiana Purchase also incited debate; Thomas Jefferson, its proponent, sought to expand American territory. However, opponents questioned his constitutional authority to make such a purchase.
Furthermore, the expansion of slavery was an incendiary topic as it entrenched the divisive North-South divide. Proponents championed states rights whereas abolitionists strongly denounced the practice.
Remember to back up your arguments with facts and examples from at least four documents. Include relevant outside information as well. Your essay must have an organized structure with an introduction, several body paragraphs, and a concluding section that expands beyond just reiterating the theme.
#SPJ12
Two significant issues dividing the early American republic were the ratification of the Constitution and the expansion of slavery into new territories. These issues ignited debates over federal versus state powers and the ethical considerations versus economic arguments for slavery. An essay on these topics should include clear thesis statements, evidence from primary and secondary sources, and a summarizing conclusion.
When addressing the early controversies that divided the American people, one may focus on the ratification of the Constitution and the expansion of slavery into territories. These two issues played crucial roles in shaping the identity and policies of the newly formed United States. The ratification of the Constitution brought debates on the balance of power between the federal government and states, while the morality and economic implications of slavery created a divide that would ultimately lead to the Civil War.
Historical circumstances surrounding the ratification included fears of a too-powerful central government and the lack of protection for individual rights, leading to the addition of the Bill of Rights. In contrast, the expansion of slavery involved concerns over the preservation of the Union, states' rights, and the heightened moral outcry from abolitionists against the inhumanity of slavery. Proponents of expansion often argued from an economic necessity standpoint, while opponents warned of the corrosive effect on American society and the threat to the balance of free and slave states.
To construct a well-organized essay, one should begin with an introduction providing historical context and a clear thesis statement. The main body should contain separate paragraphs, each offering concrete details from both primary and secondary sources as evidence. Lastly, the conclusion should restate the thesis in new words, summarizing main arguments and underscoring the significance of the analysis.
#SPJ3
2. What were the main provisions of the law? Explain at least four provisions.
3. Explain at least two shortcomings of the law.
4. Given what you know about the Voting Rights Act of 1960, do you think that the law was effective? Why or why not?
Remember to use correct spelling, grammar, and conventions.
Answer:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most significant civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction era.
1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The law was similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 in that it aimed to protect the voting rights of African Americans.
2. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had several key provisions, including:
3. Two shortcomings of the law were:
4. It is worth noting that there was no Voting Rights Act of 1960. However, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a significant piece of legislation that aimed to address the shortcomings of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was highly effective in dismantling barriers to voting that had been used to disenfranchise African Americans in the South. By eliminating discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes, the law paved the way for greater participation by African Americans in the political process.
Answer:
2/3
Explanation:
c. Death takes the gold florins.
b. The rioters meet death.
d. Death takes a holiday.
The real answer is b. because i just did it and the rioters kill each other due to their greed.
The while Salmon Brown's account can provide insights into John Brown's intentions, it should be approached with caution and considered in the context of potential biases, limited perspective, and motivations.
Evaluating the trustworthiness of Salmon Brown's account as a source for learning about John Brown's intentions requires careful consideration.
Salmon Brown was John Brown's son and, as such, may have personal biases and limited perspectives that can influence the reliability of his account.
Here are some factors to consider:
**1. Bias and Subjectivity:** Salmon Brown may have had a personal and emotional attachment to his father's actions and cause.
This bias could lead to a potentially one-sided or idealized portrayal of John Brown's intentions.
He may have wanted to honor his father's memory and justify his actions.
**2. Limited Perspective:** As John Brown's son, Salmon may not have had access to all of his father's thoughts, plans, or intentions.
He may not have been privy to private conversations or inner motivations that could provide a more complete picture.
**3. Timing and Recollection:** The account's reliability may be affected by the passage of time and the fallibility of human memory.
Salmon Brown's recollection of events and conversations may have been influenced by time and personal interpretations.
**4. Corroborating Evidence:** To assess trustworthiness, it is essential to compare Salmon Brown's account with other historical sources and accounts from that period.
Corroborating evidence from multiple sources can enhance the reliability of the information.
**5. Motivations:** Consider Salmon Brown's motivations for providing this account.
Was he attempting to shape public opinion, defend his father's legacy, or offer a more balanced perspective?
To gain a comprehensive understanding of John Brown's intentions, it is advisable to consult a range of historical sources and viewpoints to ensure a more well-rounded and accurate portrayal of this historical figure and his actions.
For similar questions on Salmon Brown's account
#SPJ1
the answer is c i think