Consider the series 4+8+16+32+...
What is the common ratio?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The common ratio is 24 x 2 = 88 x 2 = 1616 x 2 =32
Can I get Brainliest?
Thanks


Related Questions

If 3 inches represents 90 miles on a scale drawing , how long would a line segment be that represents 240 miles?
An ordinary 52-card deck is thoroughly shuffled. You are dealt four cards. (a) What is the probability that all four cards are sevens. (b) What is the probability that at least one of the cards is a seven. (c) What is the probability that none of them are seven. (d) What is the probability that two out the four cards is a seven
If f(x) = x^2 is reflected over the x-axis and the shifted 4 units down, what is the equation of the new function, g(x)?
Simplify the quotient show the work 5 divided by nine
Will the quotient of 5 divided by 7/8 be greater than or less than 5? explain

7(x+4)=-21 help find x plz

Answers

Answer:

x = -7

Step-by-step explanation:

35 POINTS WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
Please solve it from the picture below!!

Answers

I believe it’s B
Good luck!!!

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. The table shows the heights of the 10 tallest buildings in San Francisco and Los Angeles.

The average height of the 10 tallest buildings in Los Angeles is than the average height of the tallest buildings in San Francisco. The mean absolute deviation for the 10 tallest buildings in San Francisco is

The answer:

Answers

Answer with explanation:

\text{Average}=\frac{\text{Sum of all the observation}}{\text{Total number of Observation}}

Average Height of tallest Building in San Francisco

                    =(260+237+212+197+184+183+183+175+174+173)/(10)\n\n=(1978)/(10)\n\n=197.8

Average Height of tallest Building in Los Angeles

                    =(310+262+229+228+224+221+220+219+213+213)/(10)\n\n=(2339)/(10)\n\n=233.9

→→Difference between Height of tallest Building in Los Angeles and  Height of tallest Building in San Francisco

               =233.9-197.8

               =36.1

⇒The average height of the 10 tallest buildings in Los Angeles is 36.1 more than the average height of the tallest buildings in San Francisco.

⇒Part B

Mean absolute deviation for the 10 tallest buildings in San Francisco

 |260-197.8|=62.2

 |237-197.8|=39.2

 |212-197.8|=14.2

 |197 -197.8|= 0.8

 |184 -197.8|=13.8

 |183-197.8|=14.8

 |183-197.8|= 14.8

 |175-197.8|=22.8

 |174-197.8|=23.8

 |173 -197.8|=24.8

Average of these numbers

     =(62.2+39.2+14.2+0.8+13.8+14.8+14.8+22.8+23.8+24.8)/(10)\n\n=(231.2)/(10)\n\n=23.12

Mean absolute deviation=23.12

Answer:

1st -36.1 meters or more

2nd -23.12

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean SAT score in mathematics, M, is 600. The standard deviation of these scores is 48. A special preparation course claims that its graduates will score higher, on average, than the mean score 600. A random sample of 70 students completed the course, and their mean SAT score in mathematics was 613. a) At the 0.05 level of significance, can we conclude that the preparation course does what it claims? Assume that the standard deviation of the scores of course graduates is also 48.

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean SAT score is \mu=600, we are going to call it \mu since it's the "true" mean

The standard deviation (we are going to call it \sigma) is

\sigma=48

Next they draw a random sample of n=70 students, and they got a mean score (denoted by \bar x) of \bar x=613

The test then boils down to the question if the score of 613 obtained by the students in the sample is statistically bigger that the "true" mean of 600.

- So the Null Hypothesis H_0:\bar x \geq \mu

- The alternative would be then the opposite H_0:\bar x < \mu

The test statistic for this type of test takes the form

t=\frac{| \mu -\bar x |} {\sigma/√(n)}

and this test statistic follows a normal distribution. This last part is quite important because it will tell us where to look for the critical value. The problem ask for a 0.05 significance level. Looking at the normal distribution table, the critical value that leaves .05% in the upper tail is 1.645.

With this we can then replace the values in the test statistic and compare it to the critical value of 1.645.

t=\frac{| \mu -\bar x |} {\sigma/√(n)}\n\n= (| 600-613 |)/(48/\sqrt(70)}\n\n= (| 13 |)/(48/8.367)\n\n= (| 13 |)/(5.737)\n\n=2.266\n

since 2.266>1.645 we  can reject the null hypothesis.

Answer:

The null hypothesis is that the SAT score is not significantly different for the course graduates.

Alternate hypothesis: there is a significant difference between the SAT score achieved by the course graduates as compared to the non-graduates.

Apply the t-test. The Test Statistic value comes out to be t = 1.738 and the p-value = 0.0844

Since the p-value is larger than 0.05, the evidence is weak and we fail to reject eh null hypothesis.

Hope that answers the question, have a great day!

Solve the equation −11=−3m+7

Answers

Answer:

m = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write out equation

-11 = -3m + 7

Step 2: Subtract 7 on both sides

-18 = -3m

Step 3: Divide both sides by -3

6 = m

Step 4: Rewrite

m = 6

Answer:

m = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

-11 = -3m + 7

Multiply -1 on both sides

11 = 3m - 7

11 + 7 = 3m

18 = 3m

18/3 = m

m = 6

What is the square root of 45 rounded to the nearest hundredth

Answers

Answer:

your answer is fifteen