Answer:
action bears a rational relationship to its desired end
Explanation:
In strict scrutiny the government would show to the court why some laws should not be removed from the constitution, Its a form of judiciary review. The law remains only if the government can show that law is necessary to a urgent action in state interest, if it required to achieve this interest and if the law does not use any means that is restrictive to achieve the purpose.
If the actions bears a rational relationship to the people who needs its most and the law will needed in achieving the interest then the law stays in scrutiny.
B. Expulsive zoning
C. Toxic triangle
D. Environmental racism
Answer:
D. Environmental racism
Explanation:
Environmental racism -
It refers to the environmental injustice which occurs due to any racialized context , is referred to as an environmental racism .
The discrimination or the inequality between the rural and urban is very commonly observed , where the rural suffers the worst in most of the cases .
The concept was given in 1970s in the United States .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct answer is d. Environmental racism .
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options or any other reference, we can say that what most likely happened to cool their friendship was the fact that one of them had different expectations about the relationship, while the other did not aspire to reach to the next level and have a romantic relationship. One of them misunderstood the signals of the relationship and confused the fact that they both had so many similarities. That is why is so important to be clear about the role people play in a friendly relationship in order to avoid sending the wrong of confusing signals to the other individual.
In Andrea and Paul's story, the surprise confession of romantic feelings from one friend to the other led to a surprise and tension in their relationship. This shift changed the dynamics of their friendship, introducing caution and wariness where there was previously ease and mutual affection.
The cooling of Andrea and Paul's friendship most likely occurred due to one friend expressing romantic feelings, which was unexpected and perhaps unwanted by the other. The surprise and the addition of unanticipated romantic sentiment to their relationship made the recipient of the confession uneasy, which consequently led to a change, and likely a strain, in their previously uncomplicated friendship. This is a classic case of emotional misalignment in a friendship.
They both had a lot in common, as mentioned, they were even part of the same chess club and shared similar tastes in music. Yet this revelation of romantic interest would have introduced an aspect to their relationship that was not mutual. The cautiousness since the confession could stem from insecurity about how to continue a close friendship without leading on or hurting the one with unrequited feelings.
These sorts of situations call for open communication, respect for each other's feelings, and understanding to navigate the situation well. If not addressed properly, it could lead to the ending of a friendship.
#SPJ3
extends the concept of health care beyond the medical model
b.
serves larger populations than individuals
c.
uses a multicausal approach to studying the causes of problems
d.
focuses on the interaction between the individual and the environment
Answer:
c. uses a multi causal approach to studying the causes of problems
Explanation:
Virtue
Unconstitutional
Retributive justice
Answer:
Unconstitutional is the right answer
Unconstitutional laws are those that a judge determines are in violation of the U.S. Constitution. They conflict with the constitutional rights and protections, hence deemed unconstitutional.
The laws that a judge finds to be in conflict with the US Constitution are called Unconstitutional laws. Unconstitutional laws are those that violate some provision of the constitution, whether it’s at the federal or state level. When a law is found to be unconstitutional, it is often because its purpose or effect conflicts with constitutional rights and protections. For example, if a law violates the First Amendment's freedom of speech, it would be considered unconstitutional.
#SPJ3
Answer:
The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to test the hypothesis, and development
Explanation: