Answer:
The answer is (his)
Explanation:
Jerry gave his copy of The Making of Americans to Alberto.
Which statement best describes the use of satire in this passage?
Parody is used to illustrate the impact of Stalin’s purge.
Ridicule is used to show the gullibility of the Russian citizens.
Reversal is used to show how Clover, representing the people, has changed ideals.
Personification is used to show the reader Stalin’s thoughts and feelings.
Answer:
Option C.
Explanation:
The statement that best describes the use of satire in this passage is - Reversal is used to show how Clover, representing the people, has changed ideals.
Answer:
C). 100.
Explanation:
A dietary supplement is illustrated as the product that is primarily produced with an aim to complement or amplify the diet by offering the extracted nutrients from varied food sources in the form of a capsule, liquid, or any other form.
Such supplements are primarily inclined to fulfill the deficiency of a given nutrient in our body and enhance the nutritive intake/value of our body to reduce the risk of health-associated problems. Thus, as per the question; the dietary supplements claiming 'high potency' must hold '100' percent of the specified nutrient's daily value if served in portion stated or suggested which would assist in accomplishing the nutritive requirement of the body and maintain it healthy. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
i think its b but im not sure
Invasive Species
Write a well-organized essay arguing whether invasive plant species should be
made illegal. Support your argument with evidence from the texts.
The negative impacts of invasive plant species on the environment and the economy are significant, and making them illegal is a reasonable solution. This step would prevent the spread of invasive species and protect native plants and biodiversity, leading to a more sustainable future.
Invasive plant species are known to cause severe damage to the environment, including the displacement of native plant species, alteration of ecosystems, and threats to biodiversity.
Given these negative impacts, some argue that invasive plant species should be made illegal. I agree with this view, and several pieces of evidence support this stance.
Firstly, the spread of invasive plant species is a significant ecological threat that has resulted in the displacement of native plants.
According to an article in The New York Times, invasive species now occupy more than 120 million acres in the United States, which is roughly the size of California.
Such invasive species can outcompete native plants for resources, resulting in the loss of habitat and a decline in biodiversity.
Moreover, invasive species also pose a considerable economic threat.
An article in Scientific American states that invasive species cost the US economy over $120 billion annually, due to losses in productivity, damage to infrastructure, and increased healthcare costs.
Given these ecological and economic costs, it is reasonable to make invasive plant species illegal.
By doing so, authorities could prohibit the importation, sale, or transportation of such species, thus preventing their spread.
This action could go a long way in safeguarding the environment, protecting biodiversity, and preserving native plant species.
For more such questions on invasive plant
#SPJ11
Answer:The four major supporting details are examples of silly laws still “on the books” in 1) Idaho, 2) New York, 3) Minnesota, and 4) New Hampshire.
Explanation: